[Savannah-hackers-public] Website synchronization

2010-12-06 Thread Bernie Innocenti
y projects already using Redirect and RedirectMatch. Converting them all would be impractical. -- Bernie Innocenti Systems Administrator, Free Software Foundation

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Fw: lists.gnu.org port 22: No route to host

2010-12-06 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 23:38 +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > Hi, > > lists.gnu.org is not reachable by SSH at the moment. > > Is it normal? I have no idea why it happened, but now it's working. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Xen domU time drift

2010-12-17 Thread Bernie Innocenti
>&1 /sbin/hwclock -w fi __EOF__ chmod 755 /usr/local/bin/clock-sync.sh --8<---8<---8<---8<---8<-- Then run it by hand once: date ; /usr/local/bin/clock-sync.sh ; date Alternatively, you could run ntpd, but it has higher resource usage. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: Access to GNU projects' webpages by GNU webmasters

2010-12-21 Thread Bernie Innocenti
ject > repos. Agreed. For reference, I'm attaching the web-server side of the script which updates www, gnu and non-gnu projects. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ up Description: application/shellscript import os,sys import

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: Access to GNU projects' webpages by GNU webmasters

2010-12-21 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 22:34 +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote: > Bernie Innocenti wrote: > > Some time ago, tired of having to remember which VCS was being used by > > each of the projects I follow occasionally, I wrote a trivial script > > called "up" which guesses the

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: [gnu.org #649274] colonialone ailing

2010-12-21 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 18:39 -0500, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 16:21 -0500, Michael J. Flickinger via RT wrote: > > Bernie has started with the upgrade and it's being coordinated in #savannah. > > > > I setup the downtime page and disabled the sa

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: [gnu.org #649274] colonialone ailing

2010-12-24 Thread Bernie Innocenti
;ve updated the documentation accordingly. > I also changed /root/remote_backup.sh to back up vg_savannah, and not > VG0 anymore - it was still backing up the old data. Ugh, I didn't know our backup was based on lvm. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: [gnu.org #670138] colonialone.fsf.org Dom0 upgrade

2011-02-16 Thread Bernie Innocenti
m. > > Does that include going at the colo? As long as we don't make the machine unbootable, we should be able to recover it remotely from the serial console. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: [gnu.org #670138] colonialone.fsf.org Dom0 upgrade

2011-02-20 Thread Bernie Innocenti
in the worst possible case, it would take us 1-2 hours to go to to the co-lo and restore it. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: [gnu.org #670138] colonialone.fsf.org Dom0 upgrade

2011-02-20 Thread Bernie Innocenti
someone we'd let in. This is a valid defense line only for automated scanners. It doesn't address the original problem (one of the authorized keys leaking). -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: [gnu.org #670138] colonialone.fsf.org Dom0 upgrade

2011-02-21 Thread Bernie Innocenti
our $HOME, often protected with the same password. -- Bernie Innocenti Systems Administrator, Free Software Foundation

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: [gnu.org #670138] colonialone.fsf.org Dom0 upgrade

2011-02-21 Thread Bernie Innocenti
ly use, because otherwise people tend to work them around or disable them. I've seen this happen many times in corporate environments and, while GNU contributors can be expected to be more responsible than the average developer, everyone has a limit. He who has SElinux still enabled cast

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: [gnu.org #670138] colonialone.fsf.org Dom0 upgrade

2011-02-21 Thread Bernie Innocenti
at would break if I had enabled it :-) Seriously: yes, Dan Walsh is a pretty good maintainer, but imho SElinux is not worth its TCO in most cases. Last month I attended a talk in which it looked like the SElinux policy seems to be evolving into a full-featured, statically compiled, strongly type

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: [gnu.org #670138] colonialone.fsf.org Dom0 upgrade

2011-02-21 Thread Bernie Innocenti
anguage-for-custom-policy-definition. --- END off topic --- -- Bernie Innocenti Systems Administrator, Free Software Foundation

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: [gnu.org #670138] colonialone.fsf.org Dom0 upgrade

2011-02-22 Thread Bernie Innocenti
last year or so (F13 or F14)? If there's > a tool that gives you particular pain wrt SELinux, look again... > maybe someone else has already written policy for it by now. ] Yes, the policy keeps improving for old software, but software keeps changing, therefore SElinux is never g

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] #savannah on irc.gnu.org

2011-03-02 Thread Bernie Innocenti
l. > > Is anyone opposed to this? Not me. -- Bernie Innocenti Systems Administrator, Free Software Foundation

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: [Savannah-users] registration help

2011-04-05 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 21:09 +, Karl Berry wrote: > not enough different characters or classes > > Does it make sense to relax our rules at this point? So many visible > complaints presumably means plenty of people just silently give up ... +1 -- Bernie Innocenti Systems A

[Savannah-hackers-public] lists.gnu.org upgrade: Mon, Apr 11 1600 UTC

2011-04-07 Thread Bernie Innocenti
also fix a few longstanding bugs in mailman and mharc. -- Bernie Innocenti Systems Administrator, Free Software Foundation

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] mail archives missing

2011-04-15 Thread Bernie Innocenti
ng up. I've restarted the full reconstruction yesterday, after enabling UTF-8 support. The new listserver is equipped with faster a processor and faster drives, but it still takes an awful lot of time to process 3.7 million emails in our archives. -- Bernie Innocenti Systems Administrat

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] [Savannah-help-public] [gnu.org #705563] many messages missing from mail archives

2011-08-22 Thread Bernie Innocenti
eval:check_rbl('mspike-lastexternal', 'bl.mailspike.net.') tflags RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL net score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL 3.5 # All our machines but *not* RT which tends to forward some spam to our people, # and we don't want that mail to get tagged with the trusted source

[Savannah-hackers-public] [gnu.org #649274] colonialone ailing

2010-12-20 Thread Bernie Innocenti via RT
bably not a lot longer. > Trying to add disks without an > explanation of why the overloads take place seems to be risky. Ok, we replaced the two suspect drives with two new ones. We did not add them to the arrays yet. -- Bernie Innocenti Systems Administrator, Free Software Foundation

[Savannah-hackers-public] [gnu.org #705563] many messages missing from mail archives

2011-08-22 Thread Bernie Innocenti via RT
r apparently posted the comment from 120.62.160.64, which seems to belong to a dynamic block of an Indian ISP and is blacklisted in serveral places. I'm not sure how we could reduce the amount of miscategorized posts. the listhelper mechanism is for posts blocked by mailman. The posts blocked by SpamAssassin currently go to quarantine maildirs that nobody ever looks at. (I'm not suggesting that someone should, it would require a huge amount of time). -- Bernie Innocenti Systems Administrator, Free Software Foundation

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] [Savannah-help-public] [gnu.org #705563] many messages missing from mail archives

2011-08-22 Thread Bernie Innocenti via RT
eval:check_rbl('mspike-lastexternal', 'bl.mailspike.net.') tflags RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL net score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL 3.5 # All our machines but *not* RT which tends to forward some spam to our people, # and we don't want that mail to get tagged with the trusted source