> ...
> The unscientific survey does lean toward adding color syntax
> highlighting. Therefore I have enabled it on the cgit interface for
> at least an experimental basis. It is active now. This uses the
> "highlight" utility. This identifies file types by file suffix.
> ...
This is great, t
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 4:45 PM Ian Kelling wrote:
>
>
> Bob Proulx writes:
>
> > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> > Savannah Users,
> >
> > A user on IRC (daviid) has requested that cgit on Savannah be modified
> > to perform syntax highlighting by default on the various source page
> > display p
Bob Proulx wrote:
> I did some research into this topic of cgit syntax highlighting. It
> seems there are two popular ways to enable syntax highlighting in
> cgit. One uses the Python "Pygments" and one uses the standalone
> "highlight" utility.
>
> On IRC there were various comments about pygm
Should we leave color as it is now without?
I vote for "no color".
In the alternative, I'm in full agreement with using highlight, not
Pygments, for the reasons stated (which I've also
experienced). --thanks, karl.
Bob Proulx writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> Savannah Users,
>
> A user on IRC (daviid) has requested that cgit on Savannah be modified
> to perform syntax highlighting by default on the various source page
> display pages.
>
> I did some research into this topic of cgit syntax highligh
