> [savannah-help-public] ... also among the maintainers.
>
> In my mind that would normally be savannah-hackers-public (where this
> discussion is taking place :).
This is an example of where I could not keep them all straight. I saw
that savannah-help-public and thought it was savannah-hack
[savannah-help-public] ... also among the maintainers.
In my mind that would normally be savannah-hackers-public (where this
discussion is taking place :).
This is one of the places where having two lists is unnecessary IMHO.
I don't see anything to be gained by removing one at this late date
Karl Berry wrote:
> Good question. In my mind, savannah-users is more for discussion "among"
> users
Seems perfectly reasonable. And I entertained in my head something
similar but failed to articulate it.
> and savannah-help-public is more for sending queries "to" the
> savannah maintainers.
An
Hi Ian,
On that page, add a description of what savannah-users is for and what
savannah-help-public is for.
Good question. In my mind, savannah-users is more for discussion "among"
users and savannah-help-public is more for sending queries "to" the
savannah maintainers. But in practice, a
Ian Kelling wrote:
> https://savannah.nongnu.org/mail/?group=administration
>
> On that page, add a description of what savannah-users is for and what
> savannah-help-public is for.
They were all here when I started hacking on the system. Other than
the name I have no idea about the purpose of th
https://savannah.nongnu.org/mail/?group=administration
On that page, add a description of what savannah-users is for and what
savannah-help-public is for.
