[sr #110614] auctex-diffs emails should be in the same format as emacs-diffs

Update of sr #110614 (project administration): Status: In Progress => Done Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #10: I am going

[sr #110614] auctex-diffs emails should be in the same format as emacs-diffs

Follow-up Comment #9, sr #110614 (project administration): The Subject tag was turned on over on lists.gnu.org in the mailing list configuration. I turned it off. And actually it needs to be turned off or it will break DKIM signatures. The From address I went ahead and unset so the original aut

[sr #110614] auctex-diffs emails should be in the same format as emacs-diffs

Follow-up Comment #8, sr #110614 (project administration): Hi Bob, the mails are much better now. We only have these minor additional requests: 1. Could the Subject prefix [AUCTeX-diffs] be removed? emacs-diffs doesn't have it, too. 2. Could the From: header be set to the commit author's addre

[sr #110614] auctex-diffs emails should be in the same format as emacs-diffs

Follow-up Comment #7, sr #110614 (project administration): Sorry for the delay. Life had many random convergences preventing me from having any free time at all. I looked at things today. And honestly it took me an embarrassingly long time to see that the previous post receive hook used "hooks"

[sr #110614] auctex-diffs emails should be in the same format as emacs-diffs

Update of sr #110614 (project administration): Status:Done => In Progress Open/Closed: Closed => Open ___ Follow-up Comment #6: Drat!

[sr #110614] auctex-diffs emails should be in the same format as emacs-diffs

Follow-up Comment #5, sr #110614 (project administration): Reading your docs, shouldn't it be mailingList (with capital L) instead of mailinglist? And maybe commitList would even be more appropriate for the auctex-diffs, i.e., one mail with diff per commit instead of one diff mail per ref-change/

[sr #110614] auctex-diffs emails should be in the same format as emacs-diffs

Follow-up Comment #4, sr #110614 (project administration): Hi Bob, there seems to be some misconfiguration still. The last push by Arash resulted in this output: -> git push Enumerating objects: 7, done. Counting objects: 100% (7/7), done. Delta compression using up to 8 threads Compressing ob

[sr #110614] auctex-diffs emails should be in the same format as emacs-diffs

Update of sr #110614 (project administration): Status:None => Done Assigned to:None => rwp Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___

[sr #110614] auctex-diffs emails should be in the same format as emacs-diffs

Follow-up Comment #2, sr #110614 (project administration): Thanks for the response, Bob. There's no need to hurry here. It just occurred to us after having the setup we have for many years that spawning a new discussion on auctex-devel initiated by a diff mail results in a suboptimal thread subjec

[sr #110614] auctex-diffs emails should be in the same format as emacs-diffs

Follow-up Comment #1, sr #110614 (project administration): It's too late for me tonight to fix this but I wanted to acknowledge the problem report. As to why these migh be different it is because over time the best way to configure these changed. Initially there was one way. Then there was anot

[sr #110614] auctex-diffs emails should be in the same format as emacs-diffs

URL: Summary: auctex-diffs emails should be in the same format as emacs-diffs Project: Savannah Administration Submitted by: tsdh Submitted on: Thu 24 Feb 2022 09:17:00 PM CET