Re: [gnu.org #227542] Re: [Savannah-help-public] Firewalls

2005-03-16 Thread Sylvain Beucler via RT
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:54:55PM -0500, James Blair via RT wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Mar 16 15:08:08 2005]: > > > > When we support additional version control systems, we are likely not > > to use the same SSH daemon, so it would make more sense to name the IP > > "cvs.savannah.gnu.org"

Re: [gnu.org #227542] Re: [Savannah-help-public] Firewalls

2005-03-16 Thread Sylvain Beucler
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:54:55PM -0500, James Blair via RT wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Mar 16 15:08:08 2005]: > > > > When we support additional version control systems, we are likely not > > to use the same SSH daemon, so it would make more sense to name the IP > > "cvs.savannah.gnu.org"

[gnu.org #227542] Re: [Savannah-help-public] Firewalls

2005-03-16 Thread James Blair via RT
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Mar 16 15:08:08 2005]: > > When we support additional version control systems, we are likely not > to use the same SSH daemon, so it would make more sense to name the IP > "cvs.savannah.gnu.org". Is this possible? Done. -Jim __

[gnu.org #227542] Re: [Savannah-help-public] Firewalls

2005-03-16 Thread James Blair via RT
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Mar 15 19:32:46 2005]: > > Hello sysadmins, > > Do we have free public IP addresses on the GNU network? We will > certainly need other free IPs when installing new version control > systems at Savannah, such as Arch or SVN, or if there are few public > IP addresses left

Re: [Savannah-help-public] Firewalls

2005-03-15 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Hello sysadmins, On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 05:15:59PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote: > The person replied that would not help, because apparently the problem > is not so much the firewall, but rather the use of a proxy to access > the WWW. > > It's true that this would not help with a p

Re: [Savannah-help-public] Firewalls

2005-03-12 Thread Richard Stallman
The person replied that would not help, because apparently the problem is not so much the firewall, but rather the use of a proxy to access the WWW. It's true that this would not help with a proxy. But I think it would help in Syria, where the ISPs simply don't allow SSH. __

Re: [Savannah-help-public] Firewalls

2005-03-11 Thread Sylvain Beucler
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 08:48:44PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote: > People suggest setting up another IP address and and making SSH listen > on port 80 (whatever is the usual HTTP port) on that address. They say > this would enable people to bypass most nasty firewalls. > > Are we already doing t

[Savannah-help-public] Firewalls

2005-03-10 Thread Richard Stallman
People suggest setting up another IP address and and making SSH listen on port 80 (whatever is the usual HTTP port) on that address. They say this would enable people to bypass most nasty firewalls. Are we already doing this? If not, what do you think of the idea? It is essential to explain thi