On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:26:50AM -0400, Ward Vandewege via RT wrote:
> > [yavor - Tue Mar 30 10:39:02 2010]:
> >
> > Hossam Hossny wrote:
> > > This looks like something to drive savannah-hackers attention to
> >
> > Actually no, the sysadmins are the ones who can fix this.
> >
> > Some time a
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:26:50AM -0400, Ward Vandewege via RT wrote:
> > [yavor - Tue Mar 30 10:39:02 2010]:
> >
> > Hossam Hossny wrote:
> > > This looks like something to drive savannah-hackers attention to
> >
> > Actually no, the sysadmins are the ones who can fix this.
> >
> > Some time a
> [yavor - Tue Mar 30 10:39:02 2010]:
>
> Hossam Hossny wrote:
> > This looks like something to drive savannah-hackers attention to
>
> Actually no, the sysadmins are the ones who can fix this.
>
> Some time ago, they added a size restriction in order to reduce
> excessive bandwith resulting fro
> [yavor - Fri Nov 28 14:13:19 2008]:
> Just a thought... Why don't you whitelist all mail that originates
> from Savannah? All of it should be completely legitimate (except the
> trackers' spam which the present size limitation does not catch
> anyway).
Good idea. I've excluded Savannah's IPs f
