En réponse à chris burdess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> hi,
>
> is there a very good reason why subversions doesn't allow sshv2 for
> cvs?
> is this something that would be considered?
We are considering it but it seems to be a problem for lsh users, and we have
lsh users.
--
Mathieu Roy
-- I\'
Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> En réponse à chris burdess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > is there a very good reason why subversions doesn't allow sshv2
> > for cvs? is this something that would be considered?
>
> We are considering it but it seems to be a problem for lsh us
Nic wrote:
> > > is there a very good reason why subversions doesn't allow sshv2
> > > for cvs? is this something that would be considered?
> >
> > We are considering it but it seems to be a problem for lsh users,
> > and we have lsh users.
>
> I don't understand this. I use ssh2 to connect to s
hi,
is there a very good reason why subversions doesn't allow sshv2 for cvs?
is this something that would be considered?
--
chris burdess
___
Savannah-hackers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/savannah-hackers