[Savannah-hackers] Re: diffing emacs branches

2003-08-14 Thread Rudy Gevaert
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 10:21:30AM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote: > ^emacs /usr/local/bin/log_accum -T emacs -C -m [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL > PROTECTED] -s %{sVv} > > # -r TAG - operate only on changes with tag TAG > # -r BRANCH - operate only on changes in

[Savannah-hackers] Re: diffing emacs branches

2003-08-14 Thread Richard Stallman
Sorry, I do not have the time to do it and follow it up. One of the emacs admins has to make that mailinglist and update the loginfo file in the CVSROOT file. I am an emacs project admin, but I don't know where to find that file. I don't see any such file in my checkout of Emacs. Whe

[Savannah-hackers] Re: diffing emacs branches

2003-08-14 Thread Rudy Gevaert
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 05:33:14PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote: > We started using the new log_accum script a couple of months ago, and > it worked. I observed that commits to a branch started to show the > name of the branch and the correct version numbers, and the diffs were > correct too. I'

[Savannah-hackers] Re: diffing emacs branches

2003-08-12 Thread Richard Stallman
^emacs /usr/local/bin/log_accum -T emacs -C -m [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -s %{sVv} # -r TAG - operate only on changes with tag TAG # -r BRANCH - operate only on changes in branch TAG # Use -r "" for "only changes with n

[Savannah-hackers] Re: diffing emacs branches

2003-08-11 Thread Rudy Gevaert
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 08:53:09AM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote: > Sorry, I do not have the time to do it and follow it up. One of the > emacs admins has to make that mailinglist and update the loginfo file > in the CVSROOT file. ^ has to be directory, sorry

[Savannah-hackers] Re: diffing emacs branches

2003-08-02 Thread Richard Stallman
We started using the new log_accum script a couple of months ago, and it worked. I observed that commits to a branch started to show the name of the branch and the correct version numbers, and the diffs were correct too. I've seen this many times. I have not been checking recently, though; did t