Follow-up Comment #5, sr #110621 (project administration):
Numbering still works in email generated from a Rich Markup post originating
on savannah.nongnu.org (the condition that was previously shown to work in
comment #2): http://lists.gnu.org/r/savannah-hackers/2022-04/msg00029.html
So this doe
Follow-up Comment #4, sr #110621 (project administration):
This change appears to have been undone since then; compare:
1. http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?62344#comment0
2. http://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-groff/2022-04/msg00052.html
I've made those into a numbered list in this post to see if the proble
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 12:22:17AM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
> > Is it something completely different?
>
> Yes, totally, and enormously better. From this one, you can actually
> learn C.
>
>
> We should treat them as two different works. But how?
>
> We could call this repo something d
Update of sr #110640 (project administration):
Assigned to:None => ineiev
___
Follow-up Comment #1:
I've just activated your account manually; please confirm that you can login.
_
How about reusing the gnu-c-manual Savannah project; the old
gnu-c-manual git repository is then renamed to gnu-c-reference-manual
or old-gnu-c-manual. And put the new GNU C book into gnu-c-manual or
whatever title the book will have.
