[Savannah-help-public] [sr #106712] accepting follow-ups by email

Follow-up Comment #17, sr #106712 (project administration): Forgot to add: My personal impression is that dropping the Savane trackers should be completely out of the question, and it was never considered, IIRC. Sylvain can tell for sure. Some projects (e.g. GNUstep) actually like them. Implem

[Savannah-help-public] [sr #106712] accepting follow-ups by email

Follow-up Comment #16, sr #106712 (project administration): There is an official debbugs instance (debbugs.gnu.org); all GNU projects are welcome to use it, TTBOMK. It has nothing to do with Savannah, though, and there's no integration at all. ___

[Savannah-help-public] [sr #107353] GNU patch: push rejected (non-fast-forward)

Follow-up Comment #1, sr #107353 (project administration): just do a delete-push to delete the remote branch and then push the new branch. The server-side check is of some value but can rightfully be worked around when needed (as you do).

[Savannah-help-public] [sr #106712] accepting follow-ups by email

Follow-up Comment #15, sr #106712 (project administration): there is a dupe for this: sr #107431 any chance this will be implemented? actually, it would seen that dropping the integrated savanna bug tracker in favor of a specially designed external tool (bugzilla or debbugs) which would allow bot

[Savannah-help-public] [sr #107431] mail-to-bugs gateway

Follow-up Comment #7, sr #107431 (project administration): It's already reported -- see sr #106712. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via

[Savannah-help-public] [sr #107431] mail-to-bugs gateway

Follow-up Comment #6, sr #107431 (project administration): why did you close this?! what is not clear in my comment#4? ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[Savannah-help-public] [sr #107431] mail-to-bugs gateway

Update of sr #107431 (project administration): Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #5: OK, so while there's no mail interface, your contributor can just submit an anonymous co

[Savannah-help-public] [sr #107431] mail-to-bugs gateway

Follow-up Comment #4, sr #107431 (project administration): > What is the difference with allowing anonymous comments? 1. convenience for the users 2. anonymous comments can be made without providing a back link, i.e., there is no way to get back to the commenter and ask him for more informatio

[Savannah-help-public] [sr #107431] mail-to-bugs gateway

Follow-up Comment #3, sr #107431 (project administration): > no, I mean a general optional mail interface (i.e., so that one > can reply to the mail notification and the reply is added to the > bug). What is the difference with allowing anonymous comments? _

[Savannah-help-public] [sr #107431] mail-to-bugs gateway

Follow-up Comment #2, sr #107431 (project administration): >why is it a problem to get a Savannah account? some people do not want to get an extra account for each contribution they make. > I don't see how we could add a mail interface > hat would exclude other people (only include him) > with

[Savannah-help-public] [sr #107435] FHSST project download area

URL: Summary: FHSST project download area Project: Savannah Administration Submitted by: marknewlyn Submitted on: Wed 21 Jul 2010 01:46:51 PM SAST Category: Project download area

[Savannah-help-public] [sr #107431] mail-to-bugs gateway

Follow-up Comment #1, sr #107431 (project administration): No - but why is it a problem to get a Savannah account? Plus I don't see how we could add a mail interface that would exclude other people (only include him) without Savannah knowing about him? __