[Savannah-help-public] [sr #107077] bzr+ssh:// preferable to sftp://

2009-11-30 Thread Robert Collins
Follow-up Comment #18, sr #107077 (project administration): I didn't meant 'they do not mention sftp', I mean 'they are not related to sftp'. SFTP is a transport, its use is not implicated in the symptoms you reported. Whatever the causes were, it wasn't sftp. _

[Savannah-help-public] [sr #107077] bzr+ssh:// preferable to sftp://

2009-11-30 Thread Robert Millan
Follow-up Comment #17, sr #107077 (project administration): Those bugs were filed before Nov 7, which is when the second corruption happened. During that period, we were using mostly bzr+ssh but I can't tell if some of us used sftp at some point. Our use of bzr-svn in the pre-Nov 7 period (i.e.

[Savannah-help-public] [sr #107077] bzr+ssh:// preferable to sftp://

2009-11-30 Thread Robert Collins
Follow-up Comment #16, sr #107077 (project administration): Robert, those bugs are not related to sftp:// at all. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Me

[Savannah-help-public] [sr #107077] bzr+ssh:// preferable to sftp://

2009-11-30 Thread Robert Millan
Follow-up Comment #15, sr #107077 (project administration): At least the following bugs are related to our trouble with bzr: https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/bzr-svn/+bug/462988 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr-svn/+bug/462109 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr-svn/+bug/462988 I think it's a