IOW, you suggest to continue feeding the monster and actively
discourage community-driven CAs.
I don't think our decision will have any effect on the success of
CAcert. Support from sites like ours is not what it needs most,
not now.
Richard Stallman wrote:
> I know nothing about this; I might not know how to do it.
> I hope you are not saying that people like me are unimportant
> when we judge what Savannah should do.
No, not at all. It's perfectly OK not to know or bother (but we
provide simple instructions for those who ca
I rather think that the Mozilla decision is blindly based on a more
widespread $75000 audit from Webtrust, which CAcert cannot afford. The
independant audit requested them to make changes that were not
required from other certification providers.
That doesn't change anything for ou
More importantly, I fail to see what the problem is, really. If the
user is clueless enough and doesn't understand how to validate a
certificate, what good it does if we choose a certificate that is
included in a (popular) particular program?
I know nothing about this; I might not
