> I still see and approve messages over 100k.
Interesting, I do not receive such messages for approval for my
lists.
I dunno, maybe no one sends such to your lists? I approved a message
that was 120k on a lilypond list @gnu.org this morning.
Or maybe it's a listhelper thing?
Karl Berry wrote:
>
> I still see and approve messages over 100k.
Interesting, I do not receive such messages for approval for my
lists. Or maybe it's a listhelper thing?
> Also, I'm not sure if the limit is really only on attachments;
From my experience it is not only on attachments.
> since
Recently the FSF sysadmins have introduced a 40kB size limit for messages
Thankfully, the limit is larger than 40k, I still see and approve
messages over 100k. The original message, from jag (07 May 2008
14:53:16 on savannah-hackers-public), said this:
> We have set on the MTA a hard limit o
Follow-up Comment #2, sr #106531 (project administration):
I think so, because I can send the whole diff to the commit mailing list if I
compose another email myself. And I think a 1000 line diff does not
necessarily correspond to 40kB.
___
Follow-up Comment #2, sr #106526 (project administration):
Hi,
> I've tried, but all I get is a local repo I cannot commit...
Check the "Importing at Savannah" section :)
http://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/CvSToSvN
___
Reply to this ite
Follow-up Comment #1, sr #106531 (project administration):
> Also, in my opinion, the mailing system should be in charge of
> deciding when a message is too large.
And this is already the case! When that happens lists.gnu.org, well, drops
the mail, which we want even less. This is no specific to
