Hi All,
I'm working on adding support for USB scanners for Sane on OS/2.
OS/2 doesn't have libusb, but has a library usbcalls that provides
similar functionality, albeit most of the calls use different syntax.
I have sane-find-scanner working now for most scanners, and have started
work on rema
Hi Gerald,
On 28/6/2005, "Gerald Murray" wrote:
>Quoting Paul Smedley :
>> One query I have though is about devname
>>=20
>> I see in sanei_usb.h that the libusb format for this is libusb:busno:devno
>>=20
>> Is this defined for all devices or jus
Hi Gerhard,
Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> just for curiosity - I remember Franz Bakans' efforts to make SANE work
> on OS/2 - are you working on a similar project or is it the same one?
Same project. Franz only has a scsi scanner so hasn't bothered trying
to make usb work on os/2.
I have a usb scann
Hi All,
On 3/7/2005, "Henning Meier-Geinitz" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:24:36PM +0930, Paul Smedley wrote:
>> OS/2 doesn't have libusb, but has a library usbcalls that provides
>> similar functionality, albeit most of the calls use different sy
Hi All,
I have most USB scanners working on OS/2 now Only reported problems
I have are with Avision (lack implemented IRQ transfers for os/2 in
sanei_usb) & plustek (hangs during scanning).
I've had reports of success with epson, snapscan, umax, umax1220u &
gt68xx backends.
Anyway, reviewing
I know this may be too late for 1.0.16 - but thought I'd submit it anyway.
This patch adds usb functionality on OS/2 using the usbcalls interface
from http://projects.netlabs.org/?category_id=13
I still need to patch configure.in to detect usbcalls.h and add a
#define and link against usbcalls.
Hi!
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 08:50:16PM +0930, Paul Smedley wrote:
>> I know this may be too late for 1.0.16 - but thought I'd submit it anyway.
>
> Thanks. I'll commit your code after the release. I hope the next release w
Hi All,
Wondering if anyone has any ideas on what could be causing hangs after a
scan completes with Plustek-backend USB scanners on OS/2.
This is the only backend experiencing this kind of hangs.
A sample log is at http://smedley.info/plustekdebug.zip (460k compressed).
I see it locally with a
Hi all,
On OS/2 - enable_locking gets enabled by configure, however as far as I
can tell, this is only used in sanei_access.c, and then, only by the
plustek backend - and the code doesn't work on OS/2.
I know that I can run configure with a switch to disable locking, but can
configure be changed
Hi Gerhard
Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> On Sunday 24 July 2005 13:19, Paul Smedley wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> Wondering if anyone has any ideas on what could be causing hangs after a
>> scan completes with Plustek-backend USB scanners on OS/2.
>>
>> This is the only backen
Hi All,
Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Sunday 24 July 2005 13:19, Paul Smedley wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> Wondering if anyone has any ideas on what could be causing hangs after a
>> scan completes with Plustek-backend USB scanners on OS/2.
>>
>> Thi
Hi All,
Wondering if anyone can suggestion possible reasons for an Epson
Perfection 2400 not working on OS/2.
Code is built from latest CVS, and many other scanners that use the
Snapscan backend are reported to work.
Epson Perfection 2400 seems to have problems uploading the firmware -
the log
My bad - I meant Epson Perfection 2480
Karl Heinz Kremer wrote:
> The Perfection 2400 is supported by the EPSON backend and not the
> SNAPSCAN backend. You are using the wrong configuration.
>
> On Aug 6, 2005, at 4:48 AM, Paul Smedley wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>> Wonderi
Hi!
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 06:51:04PM +0930, Paul Smedley wrote:
>> Updated patch, along with patch for configure.in attached:
>
> Your code is in CVS now.
Thanks - some small changes in attached patch.
Cheers,
Paul.
---
Hi Gerhard
Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> On Monday 25 July 2005 02:49, Paul Smedley wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On OS/2 - enable_locking gets enabled by configure, however as far as I
>> can tell, this is only used in sanei_access.c, and then, only by the
>> plustek backe
HI All,
Anyone else seeing this error when trying to update cvs via anonymous login?
cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonym...@cvs.alioth.debian.org:/cvsroot/sane co
sane-backends
cvs [checkout aborted]: unrecognized auth response from
cvs.alioth.debian.org: cvs: WARNING: Read-only repository access mode
Hi All,
Wonder if anyone has any ideas on the semi-random LiDE20 hangs on OS/2.
Most of the time - if I run scanimage -L it hangs scanimage.exe. When
it runs - I get a single beep out of the PC speaker, and looking at the
logs, scanimage has gone through all the backend exit routines.
Usually,
e calibration file is set...
Hope this helps it make more sense :)
Paul Smedley wrote:
> Hi All,
> Wonder if anyone has any ideas on the semi-random LiDE20 hangs on OS/2.
>
> Most of the time - if I run scanimage -L it hangs scanimage.exe. When
> it runs - I get a single beep
r.
>
> What does the beep mean? On Linux scanimage -L neither beeps, nor
> it hangs.
I have no idea what the beep means.. I was hoping something in the
plustek backend issued a beep and you'd know what it means :P
> On Tuesday 09 August 2005 10:06, Paul Smedley wrote:
>>
Hi Gerhard,
Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Tuesday 09 August 2005 12:27, Paul Smedley wrote:
>> Oh & I forgot to mention - in the logs that 'beep' there's a return code
>> (32772) from usbbulkread that says 'less data than requested return
Last patch hopefully to get OS/2 USB support working out of the box...
Cheers,
Paul.
-- next part --
--- configure.inFri Aug 19 20:23:42 2005
+++ configure.in.modFri Aug 19 20:23:08 2005
@@ -135,14 +135,11 @@
])
AC_CHECK_HEADER(usbcalls.h,[
- AC_CHECK
Hi All,
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:26:46 UTC, "Franz Bakan"
wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 22:14:32 +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
>
> >I have just committed some changes regarding the Makefiles to the
> >sane-backends CVS. Please test if sane-backends can still be built and
> >installed on your
Hi All,
For whatever reason, uploading of scanner firmware fails on OS/2 for
the Epson 2480/3490 scanners.
I'm wondering if someone who has one of the above scanners working on
*nix could generate a set of debug logs for me - just so I can see if
there are any obvious differences on OS/2 compa
Hi Fr?d?ric!
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 11:17:02 UTC, Fr?d?ric POUPON
wrote:
> Le Mardi 7 F?vrier 2006 07:03, Paul Smedley a ?crit?:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > For whatever reason, uploading of scanner firmware fails on OS/2 for
> > the Epson 2480/3490 scanners.
> >
> &g
HI Oliver,
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006 10:10:32 UTC, Oliver Schwartz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > [snapscan] usb_read Only 64 bytes read
> > [snapscan] usb_read: reading: 0x06 0x00 0x02 0x02 0x49 0x00 0x00
> > 0x00 0x45 0x50 ...
> > [snapscan] Read 64 bytes
> > [snapscan] inquiry: snapscan_cmd command failed: E
Hi Guys,
I got a report from a user of the OS/2 version of Sane that the Epson
RX520 isn't working. Debug log is at http://smedley.ingo/debug.txt
Scan ends with:
scanimage.exe: sane_start: Operation not supported
Only real hints (to me) in the log are:
[epson] sane_start()
[epson] scanner is a
Hi Olaf,
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:28:16 UTC, Olaf Meeuwissen
wrote:
> "Paul Smedley" writes:
>
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > I got a report from a user of the OS/2 version of Sane that the Epson
> > RX520 isn't working. Debug log is at http://smedle
27 matches
Mail list logo
