On September 23 2005 15:33, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
> As always a full patch to get Canon LiDE 35/50 to work can be found
> here(will be updated to match experimental cvs):
> http://www.pirsoft-dsl-dropzone.de/genesys_gl841.diff.bz2
I tried out this patch and when I run scanimage, the scanner (L
On September 23 2005 15:33, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
> As always a full patch to get Canon LiDE 35/50 to work can be found
> here(will be updated to match experimental cvs):
> http://www.pirsoft-dsl-dropzone.de/genesys_gl841.diff.bz2
Update:
I ran the test program from http://www.pirsoft-dsl-dr
On September 23 2005 15:33, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
> As always a full patch to get Canon LiDE 35/50 to work can be found
> here(will be updated to match experimental cvs):
> http://www.pirsoft-dsl-dropzone.de/genesys_gl841.diff.bz2
Of course, the segfault was because I didn't set this business:
First I want to thank everybody for their great work on the genesys backend,
we really appreciate your hard work!
Now the complaining bit. I've been comparing the sane driver to the windows
driver and I've come up with a few notes:
- The windows driver seems to have much smarter control of the
It's been a while since I originally brought this up, but I've pulled out
the ol' scanner for another go.
to recap: color calibration isn't quite right on my canon lide35--the dark
colors drop out to black. I turned on SCAN_FLAG_DISABLE_SHADING as you
instructed, and as you predicted this recovered
I got a Canon LiDE 35 a while back without checking to see if it was supported
(I cleverly assumed that LiDE 30 support was good enough), and rather than
sending it back, I'm giving a go at writing the backend. I'm most of the way
finished sorting out the differences between the gl646 and the gl
On January 18 2005 00:29, you wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 January 2005 03:23, Luke Campagnola wrote:
> > I got a Canon LiDE 35 a while back without checking to see if it was
> > supported (I cleverly assumed that LiDE 30 support was good enough), and
> > rather than sending it bac
On January 21 2005 00:46, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> [ . . . ] in general I suggest first to snoop the USB
> traffic on the windoze box, analyse it and figure out the basic chip
> settings for this scanner, then you should be save. It's some odd kinda
> work, but I'm pretty sure there's no way without
