Johan Wehtje wrote:
> have read the docs as well as the SCSI 2.4 how to but am still none the
> wiser as to why I get the following output from sane-find-scanner
> ===
> sane-find-scanner: found SCSI scanner " Scanner 1.40" at device /dev/scanner
> sane-fin
Carsten Neumann wrote:
> On Mon, 06 May 2002, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
>
>>Johan,
>>In your kernel config (assuming you have built that kernel)
>>turn off CONFIG_SCSI_MULTI_LUN . Some SCSI scanners don't
>>react properly to being probed for logical unit numbers (l
abel deuring wrote:
> abel deuring wrote:
>
>>abel deuring wrote:
>>
>>>Dave Close wrote:
>>>
I am dealing with a scanner that seems to return some of its status
outside the SCSI sense byte area. sanei_scsi reports this information
via DBG but doesn't provide it to the sense handler. T
Peter Kirchgessner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> some time ago problems have been reported with some 2.4.x kernels and
> SCSI-devices. What was working with 2.2.x, failed there with an "error
> during device I/O". The problem seemed to be a broken handling of
> SCSI-requests in the kernel (from mailing l
john meshkoff wrote:
> The error:
>
> sanei_scsi.c: In function `sanei_scsi_req_wait':
> sanei_scsi.c:2079: structure has no member named `host_status'
> sanei_scsi.c:2080: structure has no member named `host_status'
> sanei_scsi.c:2081: structure has no member named `host_status'
> sanei_scsi.c:2
Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 10:10:15AM +0300, Max Ushakov wrote:
>
>
>>So maybe it is still correct to use all kernel includes instead
>>of the corresponding glibc includes.
>>
>
> It is not.
Definitely not all of them. Only one springs to mind :-)
In 99% of cases applications ge
abel deuring wrote:
> "Michael S. Moulton" wrote:
>
>>I just got an Artec AT3 from a friend this weekend... I'm using the ISA SCSI
>>card that came with it.
>>
>>I've got it working in both Windows and Linux, so I know everything works ok,
>>but I am getting some weird behavior.
>>
>>Loading the
abel deuring wrote:
> "Patrick S. Leung" wrote:
>
>>Hi Erik,
>>
>>I retired using your recommendation and it doesn't help much. Looks
>>like the SANEI_DEBUG_SANEI_SCSI doesn't produces much output, but I do
>>see some low level in /var/log/message ( I did a tail -f
>>/var/log/message before I sta
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:01:51PM +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
>
>>Since the latest update of the avision backend I can't access my
>>Mustek (!) scanner anymore. It took some time to find out that the
>>reason is really the avision backend.
>>
>
> I
Rene Rebe wrote:
> Hi peoeple.
>
> I'm currently debugging a segmentation fault in the avision backend's
> calibration code.
>
> I call:
> sanei_scsi_cmd (s->fd, &rcmd, sizeof (rcmd), calib_data, &calib_size);
>
> Where calib_data is a pointer to a a buffer of 167076 bytes and
> calib_size conta
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:58:21PM -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
>
>>If you open an sg device with O_EXCL and it is already open
>>then:
>> - if O_NONBLOCK is also set then the open() will fail
>>with EBUSY
>>
Dave W wrote:
>
> I believe that this morning I finally got ieee1394 working on my box.
> Now, finally, sane-find-scanner SEES something other than my cd-roms:
>
> amd1400:/dev# sane-find-scanner
> # Note that sane-find-scanner will find any scanner that is connected
> # to a SCSI bus and some sc
k to try it. It DOES work, so
> if the problem is that the GT- product naming string is wrong, where
> do we correct that?
>
> On Sat, 05 Jan 2002 12:39:06 -0500
> Douglas Gilbert wrote:
>
> > Some scanners (e.g. HP) use the the SCSI device type "processor"
abel deuring wrote:
> Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 12:10:10PM +0100, Oliver Rauch wrote:
>>
>>>I think we could and should create a function
>>>sanei_identify_device(char *device_file)
>>>
>>>that has some
>>>#IFDEF _LINUX_
>>>test for major/minor number for S
Nick Lamb wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 12:52:04PM +, Major A wrote:
>
>>The problem with this is that it is very platform-specific, and, even
>>worse, dependent on whether you use devfs or not (in devfs, in the
>>long run, major/minor numbers will be assigned dynamically).
>>
>
> I am fi
Art Fore wrote:
> On http://www.neatech.nl/oss/HP5300C/ they talk about a usb-scsi module.
This sounds like an old module name. Two usb module names I
can see are "usb-storage" and "scanner".
> This does not show up in my kernel config, however, I have an hp53xx module.
> There is also mention of
Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 08:05:20PM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
>
>
>>I think the analysis of Andras is right.
>>
>
> Could we add some hook to try to get the modules loaded if
> /proc/scsi/scsi doesn't exist? Just opening a generic SCSI device is
> enough to load them
Henning,
The patch looks harmless.
Doug Gilbert
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 02:02:14PM +, Tim Waugh wrote:
>
>>Could we add some hook to try to get the modules loaded if
>>/proc/scsi/scsi doesn't exist? Just opening a generic SCSI device is
>>enough to l
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 01:30:32PM +0100, Oliver Rauch wrote:
>
>>Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Is anybody against the following patch?
>>>
>>>+ #define FIND_DEVICES_TOUCH_FILE "/dev/sg0"
>>>
>>
>>May be this should be a list:
>>
>>/dev/sg0, /dev/sg
Jose Paulo Moitinho de Almeida wrote:
>
> On Thursday 04 October 2001 21:01, abel deuring wrote:
> > Jose Paulo Moitinho de Almeida wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> >.
> >
> > Jose, it seems that you uncovered a serious problem in sanei_scsi.c --
> > but I'm afraid that a proper fix isn't that easy:
Yves Duret wrote:
>
> s...@michael.mailshell.com writes:
>
> > I have a Cannon FS2710:
> >
> > [root@corwin@mir scsi]# cat /proc/scsi/scsi
> > Attached devices:
> > Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 02 Lun: 00
> > Vendor: CANONModel: IX-27025ERev: 1.13
> > Type: Scanner
Major A wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there any consensus among SANE developers as of the handling of
> IEEE 1394? I cannot see anything in sanei (like for SCSI and USB). Is
> there going to be anything standard in the future, or do I just have
> to write my own code? Also, are all IEEE 1394 scanners acc
Jani Salonen wrote:
>
> Hei,
>
> I'm not sure is this problem caused by XSane or some SCSI module, but when I
> start XSane without my scanner (Epson perfection 1640) turned on or
> disconnected, the partition table of my HD messes up, and there is no any
> partitions visible anymore. although th
23 matches
Mail list logo
