Hello all,
Scanner: hp scanjet 2400
using sane-backends-cvs20051124
Expected completion date: unknown, it is ready when it is ready
Update from previous post:
key: - previously reported; + update :
- Head moves two times the expected distance.
- Excessive time in genesys_warmup_lamp()
+ excessi
Johannes Meixner writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Nov 30 18:52 Chris AtLee wrote (shortened):
>> ... if the "usblp" module is claiming the device and won't let
>> sane access it.
>
> See the
> "Epson CX3200's scanner isn't detected with recent"
> thread on the sane-devel mailing list:
> http://lists.aliot
Hi everyone,
I did some tests with the LiDE 60 and the current CVS backend
(20051204-14:10). These are my results:
Lineart:
75: ok
150: ok
300: ok
600: ok
1200: ok
2400: freeze after 6 cm
Gray/8 bit
75: ok
150: ok
300: ok
600: ok
1200: freeze after 4 cm
2400: freeze after 1.5 cm
Gray/16 bit
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 02:19:36PM +0100, Reinhard Mayr aka Czerwinski wrote:
> I did some tests with the LiDE 60 and the current CVS backend
> (20051204-14:10). These are my results:
Use the backend from experimental CVS. As mentioned in my success
report, that one works much bett
Progress report on CanoScan 3200F
-
Week ago I managed to get scanning working at 300 dpi with
no processing on in the scanner chip. That's raw 8 bit data
gray scale with no gamma or black/white shading. The experimentation
led me to study in detail the meanings of
Hello Denis,
I'm new to these mailing lists, so I hope I mail this alright.
I had the same problem like you, though before my 3490 I was struggling
to make an old canon scanner working with Xsane and learned a bit..
1: look into /etc/sane.d/dll.conf
Mine missed an entry to epkowa.conf which is e
Hi,
> Is there anything I can do to help get the Transparency unit to
> work?
As far as I know the transparency unit of the 3490 works ok. The only
thing not supported is the automatic film feeder of the 3590. Please
make sure you use the latest version of the snapscan backend from
CVS.
If y
6PM +0100, Reinhard Mayr aka Czerwinski
> wrote:
>> I did some tests with the LiDE 60 and the current CVS backend
>> (20051204-14:10). These are my results:
>
> Use the backend from experimental CVS. As mentioned in my success
> report, that one works much better, at least for me.
Le Dimanche 4 D?cembre 2005 22:54, Oliver Schwartz a ?crit?:
> > Is there anything I can do to help get the Transparency unit to
> > work?
>
> As far as I know the transparency unit of the 3490 works ok. The only
> thing not supported is the automatic film feeder of the 3590. Please
> make sure you
