On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> "m. allan noah" wrote:
>
>> platforms where libusb is available, sane will also ask libusb for a
>> list. most versions of libusb discover usb devices by looking in
>> /proc/bus/usb
>> later versions of the kernel seem to have moved or messed with that
"m. allan noah" wrote:
> platforms where libusb is available, sane will also ask libusb for a
> list. most versions of libusb discover usb devices by looking in
> /proc/bus/usb
> later versions of the kernel seem to have moved or messed with that
> location.
FYI, since Linux 2.6.14, /dev/bus/usb
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, Roland Kwee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As often, formulating a question is answering it, and here is the solution:
> do not use udev with sane.
>
> I removed the udev config line and now udev does not make the special file
> /dev/usb/scanner on plugging in the usb cable from the scann
On 7/30/06, Roland Kwee wrote:
> As often, formulating a question is answering it, and here is the
> solution: do not use udev with sane.
I'm running sane with linux 2.6.16.27 and udev-096, and it works beautifully.
Some advice:
- kernel and udev versions usually go together. In most cases you
Roland Kwee wrote:
Hi,
> sane with udev, and on how libusb works. Now this is all black magic
> to me, while calling myself an experienced linux user, system manager
> and programmer.
udev is indeed black magic, even for its maintainers.
That being said, never upgrade your kernel without check
Hi,
As often, formulating a question is answering it, and here is the
solution: do not use udev with sane.
I removed the udev config line and now udev does not make the special
file /dev/usb/scanner on plugging in the usb cable from the scanner. Now
sane works as with the older kernel, and I
