Hi.
On: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 22:35:19 +0100 (CET),
"Franz Bakan" wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Dec 2002 21:55:04 +0100 (CET), Rene Rebe wrote:
> =
> >Hi.
> >
> >Is there still the u_int64_t problem in CVS for OS/2 - or is it
> >already worked-around in some way?
> =
> No, you have worked around it. There
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:55:04PM +0100, Rene Rebe wrote:
> Is there still the u_int64_t problem in CVS for OS/2 - or is it
> already worked-around in some way?
As far as I know there is no work-around. Last time we had this issue
(frontend/tstbackend.c) some other systems were also concerne
On Mon, 02 Dec 2002 21:55:04 +0100 (CET), Rene Rebe wrote:
>Hi.
>
>Is there still the u_int64_t problem in CVS for OS/2 - or is it
>already worked-around in some way?
No, you have worked around it. There is no more u_int64_t
in avision-code.
Just two typo's in latest changelog in spelling Avisio
Hi.
Is there still the u_int64_t problem in CVS for OS/2 - or is it
already worked-around in some way?
Thanks
- Ren=E9
-- =
Ren=E9 Rebe - Europe/Germany/Berlin
e-mail: rene.r...@gmx.net, r...@rocklinux.org
web: www.rocklinux.org, drocklinux.dyndns.org/rene/
Anyone sending unwanted ad