[sane-devel] u_int64_t and OS/2

2002-12-04 Thread Rene Rebe
Hi. On: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 22:35:19 +0100 (CET), "Franz Bakan" wrote: > On Mon, 02 Dec 2002 21:55:04 +0100 (CET), Rene Rebe wrote: > = > >Hi. > > > >Is there still the u_int64_t problem in CVS for OS/2 - or is it > >already worked-around in some way? > = > No, you have worked around it. There

[sane-devel] u_int64_t and OS/2 (Was: New Avisin backend ...)

2002-12-02 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:55:04PM +0100, Rene Rebe wrote: > Is there still the u_int64_t problem in CVS for OS/2 - or is it > already worked-around in some way? As far as I know there is no work-around. Last time we had this issue (frontend/tstbackend.c) some other systems were also concerne

[sane-devel] u_int64_t and OS/2 (Was: New Avision backend ...)

2002-12-02 Thread
On Mon, 02 Dec 2002 21:55:04 +0100 (CET), Rene Rebe wrote: >Hi. > >Is there still the u_int64_t problem in CVS for OS/2 - or is it >already worked-around in some way? No, you have worked around it. There is no more u_int64_t in avision-code. Just two typo's in latest changelog in spelling Avisio

[sane-devel] u_int64_t and OS/2 (Was: New Avisin backend ...)

2002-12-02 Thread Rene Rebe
Hi. Is there still the u_int64_t problem in CVS for OS/2 - or is it already worked-around in some way? Thanks - Ren=E9 -- = Ren=E9 Rebe - Europe/Germany/Berlin e-mail: rene.r...@gmx.net, r...@rocklinux.org web: www.rocklinux.org, drocklinux.dyndns.org/rene/ Anyone sending unwanted ad