[sane-devel] still problems from xinetd

2003-04-11 Thread Joerg Napp
Hi, On Fri, 11.04.2003, 11:09, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > I guess changing printf (...) to > fprintf (stderr, ...) may be enough but I haven't even loked at the code. Humm, I'm no C programmer, but I replaced all occurences of printf(...) to fprintf (stderr, ...) as you proposed. And: It wo

[sane-devel] still problems from xinetd

2003-04-11 Thread s...@lottasophie.de
On 2003.04.11 00:59 Karl O. Pinc wrote: > I know little of sane, but I'd not expect 'saned -d' to work when > started from xinetd. I'd think you'd have to get rid of the -d. > You'd use 'saned -d' in a terminal window to debug, then switch to > regular 'saned' when it's working and you run it fro

[sane-devel] still problems from xinetd

2003-04-11 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 06:38:12AM +0200, Joerg Napp wrote: > after solving the PATH issue with the AS6E driver I ran into another > problem which prevents saned from being started from xinetd. > > Thhe situation is: sane Version 1.0.11, as6edriver version 0.4.9, scanning > from a workstation

[sane-devel] still problems from xinetd

2003-04-11 Thread Joerg Napp
Hello again, after solving the PATH issue with the AS6E driver I ran into another problem which prevents saned from being started from xinetd. Thhe situation is: sane Version 1.0.11, as6edriver version 0.4.9, scanning from a workstation after runnding saned -d on the linux box works fine. When I