>scott, not enough data from the debug logs there. with both the endianness
>and alignment issues of gcc on the slug, it could be a host of things. can
>you try doing some differences in color depth and resolution, and see if
>it is truly size based, or rather data size based.
OK, here's what I
scott, not enough data from the debug logs there. with both the endianness
and alignment issues of gcc on the slug, it could be a host of things. can
you try doing some differences in color depth and resolution, and see if
it is truly size based, or rather data size based.
can you verify that y
I'm playing with network scanning. I have a Linksys NSLU2 running Unslung
(the opened-up firmware) acting as the scanner server (for an Epson Perfection
1670, backend is snapscan) scanner. Local scanning works fine at 8.5x11
(large debug output):
http://zorac.sf-bay.org/~scott/scanimage-local-8.
