On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 15:33:31 -0400
"m. allan noah" wrote:
> Olaf indicated that he thought epson backend was still broken. I dont
> know about it's replacement (epson2).
will fix asap.
--
Best regards,
Alessandro Zummo,
Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy
http://www.towertech.it
On Monday 01 June 2009 00:58:41 m. allan noah wrote:
> there was a bug in sanei_usb which prevented sane from discovering
> newly added scanners. This was fixed in 1.0.20. Unfortunately, some
> backends only ask the system for a list of scanners during
> sane_init(). I fixed mine, but I bet other b
2009/6/1 K?re S?rs :
> On Monday 01 June 2009 00:58:41 m. allan noah wrote:
>> there was a bug in sanei_usb which prevented sane from discovering
>> newly added scanners. This was fixed in 1.0.20. Unfortunately, some
>> backends only ask the system for a list of scanners during
>> sane_init(). I fi
"m. allan noah" writes:
> there was a bug in sanei_usb which prevented sane from discovering
> newly added scanners. This was fixed in 1.0.20. Unfortunately, some
> backends only ask the system for a list of scanners during
> sane_init(). I fixed mine, but I bet other backends are still broken
>
Hi,
I have an unexpected behavior with sane_get_device(). In the standard (1.04)
it states (4.3.3) "This function can be called repeatedly to detect when new
devices become available". From that I expected that this sequence would work:
sane_init(version, 0);
sane_get_device(&device_list, SANE_
there was a bug in sanei_usb which prevented sane from discovering
newly added scanners. This was fixed in 1.0.20. Unfortunately, some
backends only ask the system for a list of scanners during
sane_init(). I fixed mine, but I bet other backends are still broken
in this regard. Which backend/scanne
