[sane-devel] permission request

2008-01-09 Thread Johannes Meixner
Hello, On Dec 19 11:52 m. allan noah wrote (shortened): > On Dec 19, 2007 9:41 AM, Colin Hogben wrote: > ... > > Another important point to allow smooth migration: we must not change > > existing interfaces (i.e. ABI) but we may augment them. E.g. do not > > change the definition of SANE_Device

[sane-devel] permission request

2007-12-19 Thread Alessandro Zummo
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:42:39 -0500 "m. allan noah" wrote: > > > > seems fine. but you want to branch the cvs or wait until feb before > > starting to work on 1.1 ? > > i think we should wait. we can add a dir in the 'experimental' cvs > tree for working on the standard and any backends that ha

[sane-devel] permission request

2007-12-19 Thread Alessandro Zummo
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:34:56 -0500 "m. allan noah" wrote: > > > > exactly. who can take care to setup the cvs for the 1.1 branch? > > > > how does this sound: > > sane 1.0.19- release in Feb, last of the standard 1.0 versions, remove > SANE_FRAME_JPEG. > > sane 1.1.0- release in May?, first o

[sane-devel] permission request

2007-12-19 Thread Alessandro Zummo
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:36:09 -0500 "m. allan noah" wrote: > > > if a branch is created, to support new data formats, could it be > > > done to > > > handle them the way (or a subset of) SANE2 is planned to do it? So that we > > > move incrementally toward SANE2. > > > > I don't think so,

[sane-devel] permission request

2007-12-19 Thread Colin Hogben
m. allan noah wrote: > agreed- it seems that we have had so much trouble getting started on > sane2 because it is so large and may have incompatibilites with sane1, > making it hard to test. my idea was to move forward in smaller steps, > trying to keep compatibility, so that old backends require n

[sane-devel] permission request

2007-12-19 Thread m. allan noah
On Dec 19, 2007 9:41 AM, Colin Hogben wrote: > m. allan noah wrote: > > agreed- it seems that we have had so much trouble getting started on > > sane2 because it is so large and may have incompatibilites with sane1, > > making it hard to test. my idea was to move forward in smaller steps, > > tryi

[sane-devel] permission request

2007-12-19 Thread m. allan noah
> > how does this sound: > > > > sane 1.0.19- release in Feb, last of the standard 1.0 versions, remove > > SANE_FRAME_JPEG. > > > > sane 1.1.0- release in May?, first of the standard 1.1 versions, no > > new function calls, only more well-known options and frame types, old > > backends need no cha

[sane-devel] permission request

2007-12-19 Thread m. allan noah
On Dec 19, 2007 11:11 AM, Alessandro Zummo wrote: > On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:36:09 -0500 > "m. allan noah" wrote: > > > > > if a branch is created, to support new data formats, could it be > > > > done to > > > > handle them the way (or a subset of) SANE2 is planned to do it? So that > > >

[sane-devel] permission request

2007-12-19 Thread Alessandro Zummo
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 06:57:27 +0100 stef wrote: > Hello, > > if a branch is created, to support new data formats, could it be done > to > handle them the way (or a subset of) SANE2 is planned to do it? So that we > move incrementally toward SANE2. I don't think so, because that

[sane-devel] permission request

2007-12-19 Thread m. allan noah
On 12/19/07, Alessandro Zummo wrote: > On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 06:57:27 +0100 > stef wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > if a branch is created, to support new data formats, could it be done > > to > > handle them the way (or a subset of) SANE2 is planned to do it? So that we > > move incrementa

[sane-devel] permission request

2007-12-19 Thread stef
Le Tuesday 18 December 2007 21:01:50 Gerhard Jaeger, vous avez ?crit?: > Am Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2007 15:03:59 schrieb Alessandro Zummo: > > I would like, in the interest of the SANE community of users and > > developers, to kindly ask the permission to add some much required frame > > types to

[sane-devel] permission request

2007-12-18 Thread Alessandro Zummo
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:01:50 +0100 Gerhard Jaeger wrote: > > > > I ask you to ease the work of backend authors > > and allow this much requested change. > > No objections from here - but, will we branch off 1.1.0 > and have 1.0.x as maintenance branch? I'd sugest so, yes. do you think the C

[sane-devel] permission request

2007-12-18 Thread Gerhard Jaeger
Am Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2007 15:03:59 schrieb Alessandro Zummo: > I would like, in the interest of the SANE community of users and > developers, to kindly ask the permission to add some much required frame > types to the repository. > > Given that: > > - some types are already in use by in-r

[sane-devel] permission request

2007-12-18 Thread Alessandro Zummo
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:45:10 -0500 "m. allan noah" wrote: > > - the new types are not active by default > > > > I ask you to ease the work of backend authors > > and allow this much requested change. > > i already have a patch to sane.h waiting on my disk. it moves > SANE_FRAME_JPEG, and add

[sane-devel] permission request

2007-12-18 Thread Julien BLACHE
Alessandro Zummo wrote: Hi, > I would like, in the interest of the SANE community of users and developers, > to kindly ask the permission to add some much required frame types to the > repository. > I ask you to ease the work of backend authors > and allow this much requested change. I

[sane-devel] permission request

2007-12-18 Thread Alessandro Zummo
To: Gerhard Jaeger Henning Geinitz Julien Blache Oliver Rauch Petter Reinholdtsen M. Allan Noah Hello SANE Admins, I would like, in the interest of the SANE community of users and developers, to kindly ask the permission to add some much requi

[sane-devel] permission request

2007-12-18 Thread m. allan noah
On Dec 18, 2007 9:01 AM, Alessandro Zummo wrote: > Hello SANE Admins, > > I would like, in the interest of the SANE community of users and developers, > to kindly ask the permission to add some much required frame types to the > repository. > > Given that: > > - some types are already in u