Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
>
> twa...@redhat.com said:
> > "I have a scanner - Epson Perfection 1240U (usb) - which works very
> > well with sane/xsane for ordinary scanning, but when I'm scanning
> > negatives (photos) the result is useless because it is very pale. I
> > still have to scan my neg
twa...@redhat.com said:
> "I have a scanner - Epson Perfection 1240U (usb) - which works very
> well with sane/xsane for ordinary scanning, but when I'm scanning
> negatives (photos) the result is useless because it is very pale. I
> still have to scan my negatives in Win2000.
> Should be possi
--zywvytGCXzdVpkje
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
I received this bug report via Bugzilla for Roswell, the current Red
Hat Linux beta:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50880
(It has sane 1.0.5.)
"I have a scanner - Epson Perfection 124
--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 12:33:03PM +0100, Tim Waugh wrote:
> I received this bug report via Bugzilla for Roswell, the current Red
> Hat Linux beta:
>=20
> https://b
