Thanks Stefan. I actually have one of these sitting in storage,
waiting for me to get some time to write a backend. I suppose you
could help move things along, perhaps by gathering some usb logs under
windows?
allan
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Stefan Schueller
wrote:
> Here are photographs o
Here are photographs of the chip set inside the scanner.
http://picasaweb.google.com/sschueller/MicrotekScanner?feat=directlink
--
-
Stefan Schueller
sschueller at techdroid.com
www.techdroid.com
978.394.0021
888.418.0403
Ok, so I got the Microtek ScanMaker 4900 (USB2400) to work under Linux
as follows:
Linux Fedora 8 -> Qemu 0.9.0 -> Windows 98 SE -> Microtek ScanWizard 5
What would be the next step? Any idea?
--
Adam Sulmicki
http://www.eax.com The Supreme Headquarters of the 32 bit registers
Hello,
I took the mustek_usb2 back-end, and made it look for Microtek
ScanMaker 4900 (05da:30d9)
The result was the output as shown below and an 320x240 black and
white image with noise.
There was no motor action, but there also was no aborts like I had with a3p1.
The question is, would it sugg
On Nov 25, 2007 8:21 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
> it's never completely hopeless, you can get a trace of the windows
> driver in action, and reverse engineer the protocol. its just a
> question of how much time you want to spend, and how much C-fu you
> have. generally, the cheaper the scanner, the
FWIW,
at this point I'm fairly certain that this scanner uses SQ SCAN11 chip.
Since no sane scanner at this point support this chip, I guess it makes the
case pretty hopeless.
data so far :
NAME: "Microtek ScanMaker 4900" aka "USB2400 Scanner" aka "D9"
TYPE:MRS-2400L48U
USB ID: 05da:30d9
On 11/25/07, Adam Sulmicki wrote:
>
> FWIW,
>
> at this point I'm fairly certain that this scanner uses SQ SCAN11 chip.
> Since no sane scanner at this point support this chip, I guess it makes the
> case pretty hopeless.
>
> data so far :
>
> NAME: "Microtek ScanMaker 4900" aka "USB2400 Scanne
I think I give up. FWIW, this is what it says inside of scanner :
the big chip (U2) :
MII S11 A212-0400 E2M11
the ram chip :
EliteMT M11L416256SA-35J DZC2HBP50 0208
Circuit Board :
LYNX-0110 REV-A(20301)
it in a way is sort of similar to description of 5900 (
On Nov 24, 20
Attached is the diff so far...
Does anyone has datascheet for SQ SCAN08 chip?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sane.microtek.scanmaker.4900.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2806 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermai
ok
* I got the sane-find-scanner to run, it finds the scanner, but fails
to detect chip.
(I noticed that sane-find-scanner does not seem to look for SCAN08 chip).
I have attached output of the running the program.
* got the scanimage -L to run.
# ./scanimage -L
device `v4l:/dev/video1' is a
i dont think that sane-find-scanner or check-usb-chip use the backend
files. they are independent programs.
it seems that the problem is this scanner uses USB_CLASS_PTP? thats
mostly used by cameras, and its not even listed in usb.h on my older
machine, so if you want to add it, you'll have to use
hello,
how do I explain to sane-scan-find that the following is an usb scanner?
# lsusb
Bus 004 Device 005: ID 05da:30d9 Microtek International, Inc.
I tried something like this, but no go (the goal is to have the
check-usb-chip routine to run).
# cvs diff
Index: backend/sm3840.c
=
12 matches
Mail list logo
