Hi,
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 03:24:18PM +, Major A wrote:
> > But as $(prefix)/etc is default, a different setting means, that the
> > user used --sysconfdir explicitly. Why should we warn about that?
> > Maybe the user likes to have it in /opt/settings/sane.d/?
> >
> > We could print somethin
> I need some help from sh/bash experts: How can I print the paths and
> have all the variables expanded/substituted? Example:
> echo "Configuration files: " ${sysconfdir}
> results in:
> Configuration files: ${prefix}/etc
> I would like to see "/usr/local/etc".
Grrr, I've had that problem be
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 01:25:56PM +, Major A wrote:
> > I have added a test for sysconfdir = /usr/etc in configure. I think
> > that's the most common mistake. Other directories like
> > prefix=/opt/sane with sysconfdir=/opt/sane/etc would be intentional,
> > so no warning is printed in t
> But as $(prefix)/etc is default, a different setting means, that the
> user used --sysconfdir explicitly. Why should we warn about that?
> Maybe the user likes to have it in /opt/settings/sane.d/?
>
> We could print something like:
> Installation directories:
> libraries: ...
> binaries: .../
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 06:50:10AM -0400, Karl Heinz Kremer wrote:
> ... and in this case it would not even have worked: The problem here
> was that the user had just the configuration files in two places (not
> two complete Sane installations). The "real" configuratio files were
> in /usr/etc
> I have added a test for sysconfdir = /usr/etc in configure. I think
> that's the most common mistake. Other directories like
> prefix=/opt/sane with sysconfdir=/opt/sane/etc would be intentional,
> so no warning is printed in this case.
Very good, but I have another idea that may be worth consid
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 06:41:37PM -0500, Frank Zago wrote:
> Since this is a recurrent issue, sane-find-scanner and maybe (x)scanimage,
> could test for the presence of 2 sane installation and issue a warning.
>
> Testing for the presence of libsane.so in 2 or more directories should
> suf
--azLHFNyN32YCQGCU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 11:07:18AM +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 06:41:37PM -0500, Frank Zago wrote:
> > Since this is a
--
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:32:24
Karl Heinz Kremer wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 11:23:09PM +0100, Emilio Fesocchi wrote:
>> [epson] sane_init, >#usb /dev/usb/scanner0<
>> [epson] sane_get_devices()
>
>This is your problem: The config file does not contain a valid entry
>for a USB scanner.
Emilio Fesocchi wrote:
> [epson] sane_init: sane-backends 1.0.9
> [epson] sane_init, ># epson.conf<
> [epson] sane_init, >#<
> [epson] sane_init, ># here are some examples for how to configure the EPSON
> backend<
> [epson] sane_init, >#<
> [epson] sane_init, ># SCSI scanner:<
> [epson] sane_init,
--
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:24:34
khk wrote:
>
>This is wrong! The major device number 180 is used for the whole
>USB subsystem, and not just for the scanner.
OK! Line alias char-major-180 scanner has been ripped off.
>Edit the file dll.conf and make sure that the "epson" entry is configured.
--5vNYLRcllDrimb99
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 11:23:09PM +0100, Emilio Fesocchi wrote:
[ ... ]
> [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of epson to 128.
> [epson] sane_init: sane-backends 1.0
[...]
> If you think
> you already did this, then you have two versions of Sane (or at
> least of the config files) installed. The fact that you think you
> commented out the v4l entry also suggests this: If this were the
> case, you would not see the v4l entries in your log.
>
> Please check that
Hi everybody! I'm trying to reinstall SANE (hd failure! @#&%!!!) for my Epson
Perfection 640U (usb) but this time I'm facing a little problem, everytime I
try "scanimage -L" I get:
device `v4l:/dev/video0' is a Noname BT878(Hauppauge (bt878)) virtual device
Here's some more info:
cat /proc/bu
> Hi everybody! I'm trying to reinstall SANE (hd failure! @#&%!!!) for my
> Epson Perfection 640U (usb) but this time I'm facing a little problem,
> everytime I try "scanimage -L" I get:
[ ... ]
>
> /etc/modules.conf:
>
> alias parport_lowlevel parport_pc
> alias eth0 3c59x
> alias char-major-81 b
15 matches
Mail list logo
