Le mardi 05 septembre 2006 ? 20:29 +0200, Oliver Schwartz a ?crit :
> Hi,
>
> > > When I try to scan in lineart mode, it makes garbage on output.
> > > The scan seems "misaligned".
> > > But if I first make a scan in gray or color mode, and then switch
> > > to lineart, it works !
> >
> > It works
Le mardi 05 septembre 2006 ? 20:29 +0200, Oliver Schwartz a ?crit :
> Hi,
>
> > > When I try to scan in lineart mode, it makes garbage on output.
> > > The scan seems "misaligned".
> > > But if I first make a scan in gray or color mode, and then switch
> > > to lineart, it works !
> >
> > It works
Hi,
> > When I try to scan in lineart mode, it makes garbage on output.
> > The scan seems "misaligned".
> > But if I first make a scan in gray or color mode, and then switch
> > to lineart, it works !
>
> It works ... sometimes :(
>
> I acquire a scan in Lineart mode and make a log :
> http://www
Le jeudi 30 mars 2006 ? 00:12 +0200, Fr?d?ric Leroy a ?crit :
> Hello,
>
> When I try to scan in lineart mode, it makes garbage on output. The scan
> seems "misaligned".
> But if I first make a scan in gray or color mode, and then switch to
> lineart, it works !
It works ... sometimes :(
I acquir
Hello,
When I try to scan in lineart mode, it makes garbage on output. The scan
seems "misaligned".
But if I first make a scan in gray or color mode, and then switch to
lineart, it works !
It seems the snapscan backend forget to initialize something in lineart
mode.
=2DBEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> libusb is there, actual output was:
>
>libusb-0.1.so.4 =3D> /usr/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4 (0x40032000)
try another debug log then, this time with SANE_DEBUG_SANEI_USB=3D255=20
and SANE_DEBUG_SNAPSCAN=3D255. Comment out everything in dll.co
> try another debug log then, this time with
> SANE_DEBUG_SANEI_USB=255
> and SANE_DEBUG_SNAPSCAN=255. Comment out everything in
> dll.conf
> except for "net" and "snapscan" in dll.conf to reduce log
> size.
Thanks but I have solved the problem. I do not know the real
cause but I think the portag
--- Oliver Schwartz wrote:
> it seems the backend is not even attempting to open the
> scanner
> device. Maybe the version of SANE you're using was compiled
> without
> libusb support? To find out, run
>
> ldd /usr/bin/scanimage | grep libusb
>
libusb is there, actual output was:
libus
=2DBEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of snapscan to 255.
> [snapscan] sane_snapscan_init
> [snapscan] sane_snapscan_init: Snapscan backend version 1.4.37
> [snapscan] sane_snapscan_get_devices (0xbfffe2f8, 0)
it seems the backend is not even att
> Try enabling debug messages:
> SANE_DEBUG_SNAPSCAN=255 scanimage -L
>
> If you don't get any output, the snapscan backend isn't loaded
> for
> some reason.
Ok I got this. So it seems to be loaded.
[sanei_debug] Setting debug level of snapscan to 255.
[snapscan] sane_snapscan_init
[snapscan] san
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:38:24AM -0700, Eelke Klein wrote:
> I'm trying to get my epson perfection 660 scanner to work. I
> have had it working on SuSE 8.2 but I have switched to gentoo
> and can't get it to work anymore.
>
> sane-find-scanner can find it but scanimage -L doesn't. I have
>
Hello,
I'm trying to get my epson perfection 660 scanner to work. I
have had it working on SuSE 8.2 but I have switched to gentoo
and can't get it to work anymore.
sane-find-scanner can find it but scanimage -L doesn't. I have
the permissions in /proc/bus/usb automatically set by a hotplug
script
$B$N!"(B
"Re: [sane-devel] Epson perfection 660 ->Problem building on
OSX"
"Dino Tang "wrote:
Hi,
i read your mail and was consulted very much.
Can't the patch file to libusb be obtained by the attached file
of mail?
--
kouno.hiron...@pfu.fujitsu.com
=2DBEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> After getting the latest tools (dec2002) and getting the CVS
> versions of everything (sane, snapscan, libusb) it compiles. But it
> looks like I am stuck where everyone else has been getting stuck.
> Sane-find-scanner sees the scanner but I c
On Sat, 2003-06-21 at 22:57, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Yeah, that's the already known multiple definition error. Some MacOS X
> users don't seem to get that error, some see it. No idea why.
> And, by the way, I have no idea why libm should define _getopt.
>
As covered earlier in this threa
After getting the latest tools (dec2002) and getting the CVS versions of
everything (sane, snapscan, libusb) it compiles. But it looks like I am stuck
where everyone else has been getting stuck. Sane-find-scanner sees the scanner
but I can't get scanimage to find it. I think that this is becoming n
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 09:04:34AM -0700, Brian D. Williams wrote:
> Thanks for having a look at that. Could I remove the offending define(s)?
It's not a problem of an offending define. liblib.a uses _getopt
internally. libm (?) also uses _getopt. Usually that's not a problem
but your system
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 05:13:08AM -0700, Brian D. Williams wrote:
> gcc -o .libs/scanimage scanimage.o stiff.o ../lib/liblib.a
> ../backend/.libs/libsane.dylib /usr/local/lib/libusb.dylib -lIOKit -lm
> -framework CoreFoundation -framework IOKit
> ld: multiple definitions of symbol _getopt
Hi Brian,
You have the latest system, but you might not have the latest tool set.
You can open the Project Builder and use the "About Project Builder"
to find out what version you have. If it doesn't say "Version 2.1
(December 2002 Developer Tools)", you don't have the latest tool set.
You
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 02:14:56AM -0700, Brian D. Williams wrote:
> I have been trying to get sane to work with the epson perfection 660. I could
> build sane with 1.0.11 but not with the snapscan addition. I could not build
> 1.0.12 at all. It would stop building at when trying to make scani
Hi,
Thanks for having a look at that. Could I remove the offending define(s)?
Brian
--- Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 05:13:08AM -0700, Brian D. Williams wrote:
> > gcc -o .libs/scanimage scanimage.o stiff.o ../lib/liblib.a
> ../backend/.libs/libsane.dylib /us
--0-1698544750-1056197588=:12806
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Id:
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi Henning (and others),
I have attached the last 100+ lines from from make.
Thanks
Brian
--- Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 02:14:56AM -0700,
I have been trying to get sane to work with the epson perfection 660. I could
build sane with 1.0.11 but not with the snapscan addition. I could not build
1.0.12 at all. It would stop building at when trying to make scanimage but I
didn't see any error messages that made sense to me. I am running t
Hi,
the Epson Perfection 660 is now supported by the SnapScan backend,=20
with a lot of testing effort from Bernard Cafarelli and others. The=20
reports I've received so far are encouraging but further tests are=20
welcome.
You can get the latest version of the backend from=20
http://sourceforge.
Hi,
> in the end we got it so far:
> The Epson 660 seems to be a rebadged AGFA scnapscan e26
I received an USB log of a windows scan and the protocol looks indeed=20
similar. I'll change the snapscan backend to make it recognize the=20
scanner, maybe we're lucky.
Regards,
Oliver
Hi there,
in the end we got it so far:
The Epson 660 seems to be a rebadged AGFA scnapscan e26
--> see below.
As scanimage currently does not work you might ask
the AGFA specialists on the sane mailing list...
Gerhard
BTW: No need to cc the mail to me!
On Friday, 10. January 2003 00:06, tcp-is
Hi,
this doesn't look too good, I think that the 660 does
not contain a LM983x chipset. Ain't it possible that
you open the scanner?
Or does anybody else know what chipset it uses?
Cheers
Gerhard
On Monday, 6. January 2003 22:29, you wrote:
> On Debian testing I did :
> #insmod scanner vendor
On Sunday, 5. January 2003 13:58, Karl Heinz Kremer wrote:
> It may work with the Plustek backend.
Or may not! I suggest to check for the chip inside!
There's a LM983x check on the download site for the
Plustek backend, called "merlin testprogram":
http://www.gjaeger.de/scanner/test/checkmerlin.ta
Is is possible to use the EPSON PERFECTION 660 under
linux? I didn't see an article witch explains it's
possible to use it.
Who hnows how to use the EPSON PERFECTION 660 with
SANE ?
David
___
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite
It may work with the Plustek backend.
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 01:31:54PM +0100, tcp-isim tcp-isim wrote:
> Is is possible to use the EPSON PERFECTION 660 under
> linux? I didn't see an article witch explains it's
> possible to use it.
> Who hnows how to use the EPSON PERFECTION 660 with
> SANE ?=2
30 matches
Mail list logo
