Hello,
On Sep 1 14:06 m. allan noah wrote (shortened):
> > > https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?group_id=30186&atid=410366&func=detail&aid=303798
...
> hmm, not as simple as that, afterall. johannes, i think your fix of asking for
> 11 bytes will cause some older models of scanner to choke, as th
>> right now I submitted
>> https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?group_id=30186&atid=410366&func=detail&aid=303798
>>
>> But this does not mean that s->hw_ink_remain contains what is
>> really intended - I don't know anything about Fujitsu scanners.
>
> oh, how embarassing :) yes, that buffer should
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Johannes Meixner wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> right now I submitted
> https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?group_id=30186&atid=410366&func=detail&aid=303798
>
> I am not sure how to fix it.
>
> For the compiler it would be o.k. to simply use
> unsigned char buffer[11];
> so th
Hello,
right now I submitted
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?group_id=30186&atid=410366&func=detail&aid=303798
I am not sure how to fix it.
For the compiler it would be o.k. to simply use
unsigned char buffer[11];
so that
s->hw_ink_remain = get_HW_ink_remain(buffer);
