Karl Heinz Kremer wrote:
>
> On May 1, 2004, at 3:37 PM, Klaus Dittrich wrote:
>
>> Klaus Dittrich wrote:
>>
>>> abel deuring wrote:
>>>
sorry Klaus, I should have had a closer look into your other mail
containing the debug output.
abel deuring wrote:
> Klaus Dittrich
Klaus Dittrich wrote:
> abel deuring wrote:
>
>> sorry Klaus, I should have had a closer look into your other mail
>> containing the debug output.
>>
>> abel deuring wrote:
>>
>>> Klaus Dittrich wrote:
>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
Starting with backend-1.0.13 the sanei_scsi layer has changed
and t
abel deuring wrote:
> sorry Klaus, I should have had a closer look into your other mail
> containing the debug output.
>
> abel deuring wrote:
>
>> Klaus Dittrich wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> Starting with backend-1.0.13 the sanei_scsi layer has changed
>>> and therefore I assume a bug in the scsi stat
sorry Klaus, I should have had a closer look into your other mail
containing the debug output.
abel deuring wrote:
> Klaus Dittrich wrote:
[...]
>> Starting with backend-1.0.13 the sanei_scsi layer has changed
>> and therefore I assume a bug in the scsi status handling, because
>> expect_ack() ha
Klaus Dittrich wrote:
> I have an EPSON-1640 with an ADF.
>
> Since I use linux-2.6 which still has trouble with USB I was
> forced to use the SCSI-Interface of the scanner.
>
> The last sane-backends version that the scanner works with
> is still 1.0.12.
>
> I looked into the code of sane-backe
I have an EPSON-1640 with an ADF.
Since I use linux-2.6 which still has trouble with USB I was
forced to use the SCSI-Interface of the scanner.
The last sane-backends version that the scanner works with
is still 1.0.12.
I looked into the code of sane-backends-1.0.14 last day and tried
to find ou
On May 1, 2004, at 3:37 PM, Klaus Dittrich wrote:
> Klaus Dittrich wrote:
>
>> abel deuring wrote:
>>
>>> sorry Klaus, I should have had a closer look into your other mail
>>> containing the debug output.
>>>
>>> abel deuring wrote:
>>>
Klaus Dittrich wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
> Start
