Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-12 Thread Jeff Sadowski
Thank you so much for helping me trouble shoot all this. They supposedly have the source code for the driver so I will see if I can compile that and see if I can find the issue with it. Although I'm not so sure how it is suppose to work. It is interesting it gets most of the image and stops near 90

Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-12 Thread Jeff Sadowski
I tried on my laptop to make sure it wasn't something in exagear and I got the same results. So I am sure there is a problem with the driver. On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 6:55 PM, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > Jeff Sadowski writes: > >> My code is simply calling scanimage the way I posted here

Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-12 Thread Olaf Meeuwissen
Hi Jeff, Jeff Sadowski writes: > My code is simply calling scanimage the way I posted here already. > Running the same commands by hand results in the same behaviour. I > have my code write the command it runs in a file called ran.txt, so I > can examine it and run it. I'm just using php to open

Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-12 Thread Jeff Sadowski
Response from brother. "Hi Jeff. Any type of sharing feature on a USB model is not supported by brother. Most questions we received for this are of a Microsoft nature, but the same policy applies to other OS's as well. If you are looking to have a machine work on multiple PC's, I recommend looki

Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-12 Thread Jeff Sadowski
My code is simply calling scanimage the way I posted here already. Running the same commands by hand results in the same behaviour. I have my code write the command it runs in a file called ran.txt, so I can examine it and run it. I'm just using php to open a 3 pipe method of running scanimage. it

Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-12 Thread Olaf Meeuwissen
Hi again, Jeff Sadowski writes: > uning sane -l -d128 -e I am able to see the following error. This > [saned] do_scan: done, status=End of file reached > [saned] process_request: waiting for request > [saned] process_request: bad status 22 > [saned] quit: exiting is probably due to the error y

Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-12 Thread Olaf Meeuwissen
Hi Jeff, Jeff Sadowski writes: > Progress. I am now able to scan jpeg files :-) Good! > it is odd that -V reports as so > > root@raspberrypi:~/sane/sane-backends:x86$ scanimage -V > scanimage (sane-backends) 1.0.27git; backend version 1.0.24 > > Is this something I should be worried about? > Wh

Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-11 Thread Jeff Sadowski
usbreset that I get here allows me to start another scan https://askubuntu.com/questions/645/how-do-you-reset-a-usb-device-from-the-command-line It is just the last bit of the scan that stops. On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Jeff Sadowski wrote: > I wonder it it works the same on a true x86 arc

Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-11 Thread Jeff Sadowski
I wonder it it works the same on a true x86 architecture it could be something with the brother driver. After those messages are generated the saned program stays running and tries to process other requests. However I need to reboot for it to start working again. I should be able to reset the usb p

Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-11 Thread Jeff Sadowski
uning sane -l -d128 -e I am able to see the following error. root@raspberrypi:~:arm$ saned -l -d128 -e [saned] do_scan: wrote 8192 bytes to client [saned] do_scan: trying to read 8188 bytes from scanner [saned] do_scan: read 8188 bytes from scanner [saned] do_scan: trying to write 8192 bytes to c

Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-11 Thread Jeff Sadowski
ah looks like I need the -l flag On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:21 AM, Jeff Sadowski wrote: > Progress. I am now able to scan jpeg files :-) > And test out more of my phpsaneng program. > My preview worked awesome. I was able to watch the image as it was > being scanned. > > I redid git as recommende

Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-11 Thread Jeff Sadowski
Progress. I am now able to scan jpeg files :-) And test out more of my phpsaneng program. My preview worked awesome. I was able to watch the image as it was being scanned. I redid git as recommended in INSTALL.linux apt remove sane sane-utils git clone git://git.debian.org/sane/sane-backends.git

Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-11 Thread Jeff Sadowski
root@raspberrypi:~:arm$ dpkg -c brscan2-0.2.5-1.i386.deb |grep lib|grep so -rwxr-xr-x root/root 11444 2009-12-01 18:38 ./usr/lib/libbrcolm2.so.1.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x root/root 27912 2009-12-01 18:38 ./usr/lib/libbrscandec2.so.1.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x root/root 94516 2009-12-01 18:38 ./usr/lib/sane/li

Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-11 Thread Olaf Meeuwissen
Hi, Jeff Sadowski writes: > It seems to be wanting .la files when I have .so files so is there a > flag to support shared object files over .la? The dynamic loading should look for .la files first and failing to find those, look for .so files. You don't need any flag for that (and AFAIK there i

Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-10 Thread Jeff Sadowski
It seems to be wanting .la files when I have .so files so is there a flag to support shared object files over .la? On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 1:36 PM, Jeff Sadowski wrote: > I pulled the current git of sane-backend from > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/sane/sane-backends.git > > I did > ./configure

Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-10 Thread Jeff Sadowski
I pulled the current git of sane-backend from https://anonscm.debian.org/git/sane/sane-backends.git I did ./configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var -- make make install now when I run "scanimage -L" it can't see my scanner. Is there a flag

Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-10 Thread Jeff Sadowski
root@raspberrypi:~:x86$ scanimage --version scanimage (sane-backends) 1.0.24; backend version 1.0.24 ugh that is old debian-8 image from exagear is a bit dated. I'll get the current backend and compile that and see if that works. I have no idea how or if this will work since it is an emulated x86

Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-07 Thread Olaf Meeuwissen
Hi Jeff, Jeff writes: > On 07/01/18 05:53, Jeff Sadowski wrote: >> I'm using debian in exagear do they compile scanimage without support >> for jpeg and png? It is looking like I have to try and put some other >> virtual os on my raspberry pi 3 system. > > Isn't it just easier to use ImageMagick

Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-07 Thread Olaf Meeuwissen
Hi Jeff, Jeff Sadowski writes: > I'm using debian in exagear do they compile scanimage without support > for jpeg and png? It is looking like I have to try and put some other > virtual os on my raspberry pi 3 system. That may depend on the Debian version and architecture you're using. You can ch

Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-07 Thread Olaf Meeuwissen
Hi Jeff, Jeff Sadowski writes: > So, renaming my image from the directly connected method to pmn allows > me to view it. Now to find out what I need to get a jpeg, tiff, png > images. Your scanimage needs to be linked to JPEG, TIFF and PNG libraries. You can check with ldd $(which scanimage)

Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-07 Thread Jeff
On 07/01/18 05:53, Jeff Sadowski wrote: > I'm using debian in exagear do they compile scanimage without support > for jpeg and png? It is looking like I have to try and put some other > virtual os on my raspberry pi 3 system. Isn't it just easier to use ImageMagick or GraphicsMagick to convert fro

Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-06 Thread Jeff Sadowski
I'm using debian in exagear do they compile scanimage without support for jpeg and png? It is looking like I have to try and put some other virtual os on my raspberry pi 3 system. On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 9:17 PM, Jeff Sadowski wrote: > So, renaming my image from the directly connected method to pm

Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-06 Thread Jeff Sadowski
So, renaming my image from the directly connected method to pmn allows me to view it. Now to find out what I need to get a jpeg, tiff, png images. On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 8:54 PM, Jeff Sadowski wrote: > interesting I searched for "scanimage # sane data follows" and came across > > https://github.c

Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-06 Thread Jeff Sadowski
interesting I searched for "scanimage # sane data follows" and came across https://github.com/kkaempf/sane-backends/blob/master/frontend/scanimage.c and looking at that it looks like I was getting a pnm header even though I asked for a jpg. maybe I need to install jpg packages to use scanimage to

Re: [sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-05 Thread Jeff Sadowski
Server side with saned root@raspberrypi:~:x86$ while [ 1 ];do saned -d 128;done [saned] main: starting debug mode (level 2) [saned] saned (AF-indep+IPv6) from sane-backends 1.0.24 starting up [saned] do_bindings: [0] bind failed: Address already in use [saned] check_host: access by remote host: ::

[sane-devel] Weird behavior in exagear.

2018-01-05 Thread Jeff Sadowski
I started my scanner testing with my project. :-) My project phpsaneng seems to be working. The way I want to use my scanner, not so much. Maybe one of you would know what is happening here. I currently have 2 ways to connect to my scanner. Via saned or using scanimage directly. I was surprised