--mSxgbZZZvrAyzONB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 10:14:51PM +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> The last time I checked this didn't work. Even with chmod a+rw the
> kernel insisted on beeing root to access /dev/port. I think this
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 09:03:32PM +0100, Tim Waugh wrote:
> Indeed. Of course, you'll need to set the appropriate permissions for
> /dev/parport*. If need be, any drivers that use /dev/port could be
> made to run as root by setting permissive permissions on /dev/port,
> although of course t
--5vNYLRcllDrimb99
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 08:00:27PM +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> All this is only true for backends that directly access the parport
> (/dev/port or inb/outb).
> Using a special kernel module or lib
The Epson 1650 is reliable supported by SANE. It has recently been
replaced by the 1660 whis is much the same, but with USB2.0 instead
of USB1.1. A good friend has purchaed this scaner and tested it with
SANE. It is available for Euro 253,30 from http://www.eisystems.be.
This scanner may be one
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 07:13:45PM +0200, antoine wrote:
> > This means you can't use most of the parport scanners because you
> > need to be root and/or fiddle with saned and config files.
> -
> I dont understand the relation between parport scanners and to be root to
> config file ?
> > Somebody can tell me which low price scanner (USB or // port) is
> > perfectely compatible on Linux ?
> Probably any of the devices mentioned at the SANE website. At least if
> it isn't marked "unsupported" or "untested".
> > works means that I only have to open "xsane" and the window appears t
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:03:37PM +0200, antoine wrote:
> Somebody can tell me which low price scanner (USB or // port) is perfectely
> compatible on Linux ?
Probably any of the devices mentioned at the SANE website. At least if
it isn't marked "unsupported" or "untested".
> works means tha
> No, this means that the Umax backend only supports one USB scanner:
> the Astra2200/MX3. Check the remaining list entries, only this one is
> listed.
> Henning
---
yes, you are right ... unfortunately .. :-)
So :
Somebody can tell me which low price scanner (USB or // port) is perfe
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 05:25:03PM +0200, antoine wrote:
> On http://www.mostang.com/sane/sane-backends.html
> I read on UMAX backend :
>
> USB scanners
> All but Astra2200/MX3 not supported - see backend umax1220u
>
> So it seems that all Umax with port
Le Lundi 30 Septembre 2002 17:01, Major A a =E9crit :
> > Is the Umax UltraSlim 1200 USB port, compatible with Linux ? (RH 7.3=
)
> As far as I know, it's not currently supported by SANE. It seems,
> however, that it's based on a Teco/Relisys chip, so it might be
> supported in the future, if you
10 matches
Mail list logo
