[sane-devel] Umax 1220P not detected with /dev/parport0

2002-10-21 Thread stef
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 11:00:24PM +0100, Ryan Harkin wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Just an update on my scanner problem, sorry if I am boring you > > I have just downloaded and built kernel 2.4.18 from kernel.org and find that > my scanner works perfectly with /dev/parport0 as root and user.

[sane-devel] Umax 1220P not detected with /dev/parport0

2002-10-20 Thread Ryan Harkin
Hello everyone, Just an update on my scanner problem, sorry if I am boring you I have just downloaded and built kernel 2.4.18 from kernel.org and find t= hat=20 my scanner works perfectly with /dev/parport0 as root and user. So, the diffs between 2.4.18 and 2.4.18-14 break something on my sy

[sane-devel] Umax 1220P not detected with /dev/parport0

2002-10-17 Thread Ryan Harkin
Sorry everyone, I lied. RedHat 8.0 uses kernel 2.4.18-14. My BIOS options that I have tried with my RedHat 8.0 system are: =09Normal - no response from directio or ppdev =09EPP - response from directio only =09ECP - not tried =09ECP + EPP, DMA mode 1 - no response from directio or ppdev =09ECP +

[sane-devel] Umax 1220P not detected with /dev/parport0

2002-10-17 Thread Ryan Harkin
Hi Stef, Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. Unfortunately, this isn't the problem that I am experiencing. My compute= r was=20 originally set for ECP/EPP when I had SuSE 7.2. I could not get the scan= ner=20 to work at all (directio or ppdev). A simple change to EPP only and it=20 sprun

[sane-devel] Umax 1220P not detected with /dev/parport0

2002-10-17 Thread stef
I assume you are using a kernel version >2.4.18. Since 2.4.19, and the introduction of O_NONBLOCK semantics in /dev/parport, I get the same hangs when my BIOS is set to EPP. These hangs do not happen with direct hardware access. Personnaly, I set my BIOS to ECP/EPP, and all work fine.

[sane-devel] Umax 1220P not detected with /dev/parport0

2002-10-16 Thread Ryan Harkin
As a quick update, I am tracing through the scanner detection using umax_= pp=20 and I think have found where the scanner hangs in this program: I have added a few debug lines of my own: umax_pp_low.c 3416: int 3417: sanei_umax_pp_ReleaseScanner (void) 3418: { 3419: int reg; 3420:=20 3421: DB

[sane-devel] Umax 1220P not detected with /dev/parport0

2002-10-16 Thread Ryan Harkin
Hi, I have a Umax 1220P parallel port scanner that I have sucessfully install= ed=20 with SuSE 7.2 to use /dev/parport0 as both root and normal user. Now I am trying to get it to work with a newer distro and wondered if som= eone=20 could help out. And I realise that you all have work to do on 1.