On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Gernot Hassenpflug
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:12 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Gernot Hassenpflug
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:56 AM, m. allan noah
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Gernot Has
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:12 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Gernot Hassenpflug
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:56 AM, m. allan noah
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Gernot Hassenpflug
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:38 AM, m. allan
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:56 AM, m. allan noah wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Gernot Hassenpflug
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:38 AM, m. allan noah
>> wrote:
>>> Do you find that the machine actually makes any control packets once
>>> it starts scanning? Many scanners only
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:38 AM, m. allan noah wrote:
> Do you find that the machine actually makes any control packets once
> it starts scanning? Many scanners only use those at initial
> configuration, which is taken care of by the host OS, and calls to set
> interface, etc. I have found that I
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Gernot Hassenpflug
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:56 AM, m. allan noah wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Gernot Hassenpflug
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:38 AM, m. allan noah
>>> wrote:
Do you find that the machine actually makes
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Pierre Willenbrock
wrote:
> Gernot Hassenpflug schrieb:
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Pierre Willenbrock
>> wrote:
>>> Gernot Hassenpflug schrieb:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:05 AM, m. allan noah
wrote:
>
> What happens is this: The device driver(m
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Pierre Willenbrock
wrote:
> Gernot Hassenpflug schrieb:
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:05 AM, m. allan noah wrote:
>> /../
>> Are endpoints apart from the default 0x able to have both IN
>> and OUT now? Or did I misunderstand the log file (and spike4 output
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:05 AM, m. allan noah wrote:
> Attached is a copy of a script I wrote that clears up these verbose
> logs. I don't know if it is the most recent version, I cannot reach my
> development machine, and i just found this copy with google :)
Thanks for that, I had seen it but
Gernot Hassenpflug schrieb:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Pierre Willenbrock
> wrote:
>> Gernot Hassenpflug schrieb:
>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:05 AM, m. allan noah
>>> wrote:
>>> /../
>>> Are endpoints apart from the default 0x able to have both IN
>>> and OUT now? Or did I misu
Gernot Hassenpflug schrieb:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:05 AM, m. allan noah wrote:
>> Attached is a copy of a script I wrote that clears up these verbose
>> logs. I don't know if it is the most recent version, I cannot reach my
>> development machine, and i just found this copy with google :)
>
Do you find that the machine actually makes any control packets once
it starts scanning? Many scanners only use those at initial
configuration, which is taken care of by the host OS, and calls to set
interface, etc. I have found that I generally only use bulk packets
with most scanners...
allan
O
Dear all,
I am trying to analyse the CanoScan 8800F SniffUSB 2.0 results (WinXP
Pro in VMware) and am confused by a few things.
1) there are 4 endpoints:
*?0x which has both IN and OUT version;
* 0x0007 which is a bulk type, seems to be for OUT only;
* 0x0088 which
Attached is a copy of a script I wrote that clears up these verbose
logs. I don't know if it is the most recent version, I cannot reach my
development machine, and i just found this copy with google :)
basically:
cat UsbSnoop.log | perl spike4.pl > UsbSnoop.out
then look at the .out file.
allan
13 matches
Mail list logo
