[sane-devel] SANE2 standard revisited: Code flow

2002-12-10 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:36:22PM +0100, Oliver Rauch wrote: > > "... However, as options are set, other options may become active or > > inactive or their constraint may change. Thus, after setting > > an option, it may be necessary to re-read the descriptors." > > > > | Image data is coll

[sane-devel] SANE2 standard revisited: Code flow

2002-12-09 Thread Oliver Rauch
On Friday 06 December 2002 20:24, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > Proposal: > > "... However, as options are set, other options may become active or > inactive or their constraint may change. Thus, after setting > an option, it may be necessary to re-read the descriptors." > > | Image data is coll

[sane-devel] SANE2 standard revisited: Code flow

2002-12-09 Thread Matto Marjanovic
>From: Oliver Rauch >Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 23:36:22 +0100 > >On Friday 06 December 2002 20:24, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: >> Proposal: ... >but this would make the sane_cancel unnecessaryly complex >because you have to call > > sane_cancel > while (sane_read != SANE_STATUS_E

[sane-devel] SANE2 standard revisited: Code flow

2002-12-06 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 06:09:57PM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > http://www.meier-geinitz.de/sane/sane2/ Now the code flow: | 4.4 Code Flow http://www.meier-geinitz.de/sane/sane2/0.07/doc013.html#s4.4 Just a general comment: This is one of the most important parts of the SANE standa