[sane-devel] SANE standard details

2002-01-18 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 10:34:56PM -0600, Peter Fales wrote: > I'm also trying to do exactly that, but I think xscanimage doesn't handle it > quite right. My camera backends have an "image number" selection which > is constrained from 1 to the number of images in the camera. If I delete

[sane-devel] SANE standard details

2002-01-18 Thread Peter Fales
> How can you set SANE_INFO_RELOAD_OPTIONS during the scan? You can only do this > in sane_control_option as far as I see. You're right. I wasn't clear about that. What I actually do is set a flag so that the next time sane_control_option is called, it will set SANE_INFO_RELOAD_OPTIONS no matter

[sane-devel] SANE standard details

2002-01-17 Thread Peter Fales
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 09:34:00PM +, Major A wrote: > another question to SANE developers: when the flag > "SANE_INFO_RELOAD_OPTIONS" is set by the backend, does that mean that > the option's contraints may have changed? I would like to make it > possible for the backend to have a variable num

[sane-devel] SANE standard details

2002-01-17 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 09:34:00PM +, Major A wrote: > another question to SANE developers: when the flag > "SANE_INFO_RELOAD_OPTIONS" is set by the backend, does that mean that > the option's contraints may have changed? I think so, yes. At least that's what I do in the mustek backend wh

[sane-devel] SANE standard details

2002-01-16 Thread Major A
Hi, another question to SANE developers: when the flag "SANE_INFO_RELOAD_OPTIONS" is set by the backend, does that mean that the option's contraints may have changed? I would like to make it possible for the backend to have a variable number of frames that can be selected, and this can change duri