Randolph Fritz wrote:
> I think, probably, a better approach would be to have sanei_osx_SAM.c.
> But, the API is very new, and Apple plans on offering their own
> standard scanner driver ("In later versions of Mac OS X, however, the
> mass storage stack will include support for other SCSI periphera
Guy Brooker wrote:
> It's been a while since I've been able to concentrate on SANE, apologies for
> my absence.
>
> I added the OSX_ONLY_10_2_API and OSX_ONLY_10_1_API defines as I knew the
> old API was going to go, but didn't have time to test on Panther at the
> time.
>
> Could someone add a t
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 12:30:51PM -0800, Randolph Fritz wrote:
> > If you tell me for what I should test I can propse a test :-)
> >
>
> Darwin version 6 or higher, I think, would work.
Ok, and how can I check for that version? Is there a C macro or can I
use some program (uname?)?
Bye,
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 09:53:18PM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 12:30:51PM -0800, Randolph Fritz wrote:
> > > If you tell me for what I should test I can propse a test :-)
> > >
> >
> > Darwin version 6 or higher, I think, would work.
>
> Ok, and how can I
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 05:51:36PM +0100, Guy Brooker wrote:
> It's been a while since I've been able to concentrate on SANE, apologies for
> my absence.
>
> I added the OSX_ONLY_10_2_API and OSX_ONLY_10_1_API defines as I knew the
> old API was going to go, but didn't have time to test on Pa
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 08:52:38PM -0800, Randolph Fritz wrote:
> Would that this was that simple! The new Mac OS X "SCSI Architecture
> Model" is misnamed; it is a grand unified transport layer, covering
> "SCSI, USB (Storage), FireWire SBP2 and ATAPI". So this may be the
> story for a lot
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 02:38:07PM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 05:51:36PM +0100, Guy Brooker wrote:
> >
> > It's been a while since I've been able to concentrate on SANE,
> > apologies for my absence.
> >
> > I added the OSX_ONLY_10_2_API and OSX_ONLY_10_1_API
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 02:34:40PM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 08:52:38PM -0800, Randolph Fritz wrote:
> > Would that this was that simple! The new Mac OS X "SCSI Architecture
> > Model" is misnamed; it is a grand unified transport layer, covering
> > "SC
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 09:02:22AM -, Phil Barrett wrote:
> > Well, I can't help because I don't have any MacOS X experience but
> > maybe one of the OS X hackers can. So I quote everything and send it
> > to sane-devel. Please reply to sane-devel, not to me personally.
> >
> > > -DV_MAJOR=1 -D
It's been a while since I've been able to concentrate on SANE, apologies for
my absence.
I added the OSX_ONLY_10_2_API and OSX_ONLY_10_1_API defines as I knew the
old API was going to go, but didn't have time to test on Panther at the
time.
Could someone add a test to the config script ?
The new
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 09:02:22AM -, Phil Barrett wrote:
> Simple enough: this header is an old API, which is not included in OS X 10.3
> (Panther).
>
> The code for the new API is in sanei_scsi.c already, so the solution is just
> to define OSX_ONLY_10_2_API somewhere.
>
> It seems thi
> Well, I can't help because I don't have any MacOS X experience but
> maybe one of the OS X hackers can. So I quote everything and send it
> to sane-devel. Please reply to sane-devel, not to me personally.
>
> > -DV_MAJOR=1 -DV_MINOR=0 -D_REENTRANT -g -O2 -W -Wall sanei_scsi.c
> > sanei_scsi.c:210
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 08:59:54PM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 11:05:49AM -0700, Erick Schmidt wrote:
> > I tried the sane-backends in the snapshots directory per your link
> > below and received the same error:
>
> Well, I can't help because I don't have any
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 11:05:49AM -0700, Erick Schmidt wrote:
> I tried the sane-backends in the snapshots directory per your link
> below and received the same error:
Well, I can't help because I don't have any MacOS X experience but
maybe one of the OS X hackers can. So I quote everything
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 08:06:31PM -0700, Erick Schmidt wrote:
> gcc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../include -I../include
> -DPATH_SANE_CONFIG_DIR=/usr/local/etc/sane.d
> -DPATH_SANE_DATA_DIR=/usr/local/share -DV_MAJOR=1 -DV_MINOR=0
> -g -O2 -W -Wall sanei_scsi.c
> sanei_scsi.c
Here is the whole output when "make" is ran.
powerbk-g4:/build/sane-backends-1.0.12 root# make
making all in include
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
making all in lib
gcc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../include/sane -I../include
-DPATH_SANE_CONFIG_DIR=/usr/local/etc/sane.d
-DPATH_S
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 01:15:21PM -0700, Erick Schmidt wrote:
> Has anyone been able to successfully install SANE on a OS X box running
> 10.3 (Panther)? I tried installing the new version of SANE 1.0.13 and
> SANE 1.0.12 and received the following error:
>
>
> ...
> sanei_scsi.c: In
Hi,
Has anyone been able to successfully install SANE on a OS X box running
10.3 (Panther)? I tried installing the new version of SANE 1.0.13 and
SANE 1.0.12 and received the following error:
...
sanei_scsi.c: In function `sanei_scsi_req_wait':
sanei_scsi.c:5935: warning: unused parameter
18 matches
Mail list logo
