[sane-devel] Problem with developing a new backend for Plustek OpticPro ST28

2012-11-02 Thread Stef
it? please check your > scanner VID/PID and compare them with 0x07b3/0x0802. > > Regards, > Mohammad-Reza > > > > - Original Message - > From: Yury Tarasievich > To: "sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org" > > Cc: > Sent: Friday, 12 October 2012,

[sane-devel] Problem with developing a new backend for Plustek OpticPro ST28

2012-10-12 Thread Yury Tarasievich
You are right, there are couple of registers in Wolfson DACs, accessed via some sort of specific serial interface. The frontend -- as the Genesys GL* datasheets understand the word. Never mind. My scanner is indeed ST28 with USB IDs 0x7B3 0x802. So yours would be, too. Your hardware list fits

[sane-devel] Problem with developing a new backend for Plustek OpticPro ST28

2012-10-12 Thread Yury Tarasievich
On 10/12/2012 07:57 AM, Stef wrote: > these hardware information can help us to > find how close to another scanner a specific > model is. Since the ST24 is an unsupported GL646 > scanner, it is not as helpful as it could have > been. Even when hardware is known, you'll have > to know exactly

[sane-devel] Problem with developing a new backend for Plustek OpticPro ST28

2012-10-12 Thread Stef
On 11/10/2012 19:51, Yury Tarasievich wrote: > I'm willing to cross-test what you'll be producing for the ST28, as I > have one also, but have currently no time to put into development. > > On 10/11/2012 06:38 PM, Mohammad-Reza Nabipoor wrote: > ... >> And, according to my scanner board: >> * It i

[sane-devel] Problem with developing a new backend for Plustek OpticPro ST28

2012-10-12 Thread Mohammad-Reza Nabipoor
- From: Yury Tarasievich To: "sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org" Cc: Sent: Friday, 12 October 2012, 9:34 Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Problem with developing a new backend for Plustek OpticPro ST28 On 10/12/2012 07:57 AM, Stef wrote: >? ? ? these hardware information can help

[sane-devel] Problem with developing a new backend for Plustek OpticPro ST28

2012-10-11 Thread Yury Tarasievich
I'm willing to cross-test what you'll be producing for the ST28, as I have one also, but have currently no time to put into development. On 10/11/2012 06:38 PM, Mohammad-Reza Nabipoor wrote: ... > And, according to my scanner board: > * It is a GL841-based scanner > * It uses ILX569K CCD. (same

[sane-devel] Problem with developing a new backend for Plustek OpticPro ST28

2012-10-11 Thread Mohammad-Reza Nabipoor
Dear Stef, As you asked me about my data about the scanner, I should say that I guessed most of parameters based on other scanners (espicially ST24)! My Idea is that, at first step, enable a rudimentary support of my scanner in SANE, and then change some of parameters to an more appropriate valu

[sane-devel] Problem with developing a new backend for Plustek OpticPro ST28

2012-10-10 Thread Stef
On 10/10/2012 10:44, Mohammad-Reza Nabipoor wrote: > Hi everyone! > I have scanner and I think it is Plustek OpticPro ST28 (!). I am > developing a new backend for it. > My scanner using Genesys GL841 chip. First I append appropriate codes > to backend/{genesys_low.c,genesys_devices.c} files, and

[sane-devel] Problem with developing a new backend for Plustek OpticPro ST28

2012-10-10 Thread Mohammad-Reza Nabipoor
Hi everyone! I have scanner and I think it is Plustek OpticPro ST28 (!). I am developing a new backend for it. My scanner using Genesys GL841 chip. First I append appropriate codes to backend/{genesys_low.c,genesys_devices.c} files, and append the "usb 0x07b3 0x0802" in the genesys.conf.in. I