[sane-devel] Possible bug in canon backend or scanimage

2010-11-16 Thread Myroslav Kavatsyuk
CAP_ADVANCED; Please commit this change to the git repository. Best regards, Myroslav --- On Sun, 11/14/10, stef wrote: > From: stef > Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Possible bug in canon backend or > scanimage > To: "Myroslav Kavatsyuk" > Cc: sane-devel at lists.alioth.d

[sane-devel] Possible bug in canon backend or > scanimage

2010-11-14 Thread stef
Le Saturday 13 November 2010 14:12:19 Myroslav Kavatsyuk, vous avez ?crit : > Dear Stef, > > Please find attached log of initialization and preview done > wit the Canoscan 8400F, using correct program. > > What shell we do with the bug in canon backend? Are you > going to fix it, or shell I chang

[sane-devel] Possible bug in canon backend or > scanimage

2010-11-12 Thread stef
Le Wednesday 10 November 2010 09:55:10, vous avez ?crit : > Dear Stef, > > I did not manage to compile SANE with the internal getopt_long. At > least with my distribution (Ubuntu 10.10) SANE was always built with > the glibc getopt_long and disregarding the definitions in the config.h. > However I

[sane-devel] Possible bug in canon backend or > scanimage

2010-11-10 Thread Myroslav Kavatsyuk
try during the Christmas holidays. Best regards, Myroslav --- On Mon, 11/8/10, stef wrote: > From: stef > Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Possible bug in canon backend or > scanimage > To: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org > Cc: "Myroslav Kavatsyuk" > Date: Monday,

[sane-devel] Possible bug in canon backend or > scanimage

2010-11-08 Thread stef
Le Monday 08 November 2010 12:54:11 Myroslav Kavatsyuk, vous avez ?crit : > Dear colleagues, > > Thank you for your replies. I find that addition of the --all-options > is a nice idea to improve the user interface. Unfortunately it > does not solve my problem. This weekend I tried to debug sane >

[sane-devel] Possible bug in canon backend or > scanimage

2010-11-08 Thread Myroslav Kavatsyuk
age (m. allan noah) > ???7. Re: Possible bug in canon backend or > scanimage (stef) > > > ---------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 06:57:05 -0700 (PDT) > From: Myroslav Kavatsyuk > Subject: [sa

[sane-devel] Possible bug in canon backend or scanimage

2010-11-04 Thread stef
Le Thursday 04 November 2010 22:01:48 m. allan noah, vous avez ?crit : > try American English- unrecognized > > allan > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:53 PM, stef wrote: > > Le Thursday 04 November 2010 14:57:05 Myroslav Kavatsyuk, vous avez ?crit : Indeed, it is much better that way. This

[sane-devel] Possible bug in canon backend or scanimage

2010-11-04 Thread stef
Le Thursday 04 November 2010 14:57:05 Myroslav Kavatsyuk, vous avez ?crit : > Hello, > > Just recently I bought CanoScan 2700F film scanner (SCSI, canon ackend). > It works fine with the xsane/xscanimage frontends. However, I have troubles > to make it working with the scanimage frontend. Namely,

[sane-devel] Possible bug in canon backend or scanimage

2010-11-04 Thread m. allan noah
try American English- unrecognized allan On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:53 PM, stef wrote: > Le Thursday 04 November 2010 14:57:05 Myroslav Kavatsyuk, vous avez ?crit : >> Hello, >> >> Just recently I bought CanoScan 2700F film scanner (SCSI, canon ackend). >> It works fine with the xsane/xscanimage f

[sane-devel] Possible bug in canon backend or scanimage

2010-11-04 Thread Ulrich Deiters
If xsane works correctly with the scanner, the problem should not be in the Canon backend. Kind regards, Ulrich Deiters -- Prof. Dr. Ulrich K. Deiters __ Institut f. Physikalische Chemie \ Luxemburger Str. 116, D-50939 Koeln Universitaet zu Koeln /\/\..

[sane-devel] Possible bug in canon backend or scanimage

2010-11-04 Thread Myroslav Kavatsyuk
Hello, Just recently I bought CanoScan 2700F film scanner (SCSI, canon ackend). It works fine with the xsane/xscanimage frontends. However, I have troubles to make it working with the scanimage frontend. Namely, I can not path some scanner-specific options (--af, --afonce, --highlight). Accordi