> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Simon Matter
> wrote:
>> Hi Allan,
>>
>>> Simon, this is a great idea, and is also one of the last things
>>> missing for users to switch from the (now deprecated) scanadf to
>>> scanimage.
>>>
>>> Is there any chance you could find the time to make your patch
>
Hi Allan,
> Simon, this is a great idea, and is also one of the last things
> missing for users to switch from the (now deprecated) scanadf to
> scanimage.
>
> Is there any chance you could find the time to make your patch
> compatible with the scanadf -S option? Specifically setting the
> various
Hi,
I've just came across a problem where I needed to run scanimage for ADF in
batch mode but wanted to call a script for each page that was scanned.
I know that scanadf provides such functionality but we are using scanimage
for everything and I don't want to change that.
The proposed solution si
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Simon Matter
wrote:
> Hi Allan,
>
>> Simon, this is a great idea, and is also one of the last things
>> missing for users to switch from the (now deprecated) scanadf to
>> scanimage.
>>
>> Is there any chance you could find the time to make your patch
>> compatib
Simon, this is a great idea, and is also one of the last things
missing for users to switch from the (now deprecated) scanadf to
scanimage.
Is there any chance you could find the time to make your patch
compatible with the scanadf -S option? Specifically setting the
various SCAN_* environment vars
