have never used one, but is very similar in design to the 4120 from the
hardware side. the software is a different issue. i have a contact at
fujitsu that might lend me one to write a driver... maybe time i asked.
just wish i had more time...
allan
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
>
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
> "m. allan noah" wrote:
> > the 4120/4220 on the other hand, are absolutely wonderful, heavy, small,
> > welbuilt machines, with excellent paper feeds, even for heavy stock. we
> > now have quite a few of them in the field, each scanning a few hundred
i must concur with garrick, fujitsu makes wonderfully beefy gear, except
for the 4010/4110/scansnap! models, their bottom end 'toy' scanners. these
seem flimsy and slow, and on the whole, cheap.
the 4120/4220 on the other hand, are absolutely wonderful, heavy, small,
welbuilt machines, with exc
Has your organization had any experience with the 4530C? This small monster has
great specs (35-47ppm, 100-sheet large-format ADF, USB 2.0), although its sure
to cost well over two kilobucks even if you found a discount reseller. If the
quality is an extrapolation of what you've found in the 4120C,
"m. allan noah" wrote:
> the 4120/4220 on the other hand, are absolutely wonderful, heavy, small,
> welbuilt machines, with excellent paper feeds, even for heavy stock. we
> now have quite a few of them in the field, each scanning a few hundred
> sheets per day, and are quite happy with the perf
My vote goes to the Fujitsu 620C I just bought. Although I read that the
newer 4120 is even better, if you don't need the flatbed part. The main
thing I've been reading in the reviews is that the "home" models with the
ADF feature don't seem have a ADF that is as robust and trouble free as the
