Hi,
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:43:35AM -0800, Earle F. Philhower, III wrote:
> All cleaned up. I ran with only -Wall and not -pedantic so didn't see
> these. They were mostly just syntactic hiccups, thankfully, caused by
> the libusb->sanei_usb wrapper I hacked in. Man page added as well.
I've
Hallo Henning, responses inline...
--- Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
...
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 05:21:42PM -0800, Earle F. Philhower, III wrote:
> > I've put patches (against sane-backends-1.0.15) and the new source files
> online
>
> I've had a quick look at your code and haven't found anythin
Hi and sorry for the delay,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 05:21:42PM -0800, Earle F. Philhower, III wrote:
> I've reverse-engineered the Microtek ScanMaker 3840 Windows driver and written
> a SANE driver to control it from Linux. I've done pretty extensive testing
> locally (XSane/tstbackend -l3) and r
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 12:39 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> "Earle F. Philhower, III" wrote:
>
> Hi Earle,
>
> > I've reverse-engineered the Microtek ScanMaker 3840 Windows driver and
> > written
> > a SANE driver to control it from Linux. I've done pretty extensive testing
> > locally (XSane/ts
"Earle F. Philhower, III" wrote:
Hi Earle,
> I've reverse-engineered the Microtek ScanMaker 3840 Windows driver and written
> a SANE driver to control it from Linux. I've done pretty extensive testing
> locally (XSane/tstbackend -l3) and remotely (saned on my Devil-Linux server
> and
> SANETwa
Hi all,
I've reverse-engineered the Microtek ScanMaker 3840 Windows driver and written
a SANE driver to control it from Linux. I've done pretty extensive testing
locally (XSane/tstbackend -l3) and remotely (saned on my Devil-Linux server and
SANETwain under Windows) and not found any problems.
C
