[sane-devel] HP 4600 vs. Mustek_usb2

2008-12-10 Thread Igor G Novikov
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 22:50 -0500, Triften Chmil wrote: > The output of sane-find-scanner -v -v on > http://www.sane-project.org/unsupported/hp-scanjet-4600.html says that > it may contain an SQ113 chip, which is the same as in the Mustek_usb2 > supported scanners, so I've started comparing the log

[sane-devel] HP 4600 vs. Mustek_usb2

2008-12-09 Thread Triften Chmil
Allan, Igor, Thanks for the replies! Sadly, it seems a bit more involved than I am ready for at the moment. Though, is it necessary to remove all of SANE and recompile from sources if I were to start programming a new backend? The more I look at the Mustek_usb2 code and the usb log file, the more

[sane-devel] HP 4600 vs. Mustek_usb2

2008-12-09 Thread m. allan noah
you'll have to find the usb vid and pid in the backend source, and change it there. allan On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Triften Chmil wrote: > The output of sane-find-scanner -v -v on > http://www.sane-project.org/unsupported/hp-scanjet-4600.html says that > it may contain an SQ113 chip, whic

[sane-devel] HP 4600 vs. Mustek_usb2

2008-12-08 Thread Triften Chmil
The output of sane-find-scanner -v -v on http://www.sane-project.org/unsupported/hp-scanjet-4600.html says that it may contain an SQ113 chip, which is the same as in the Mustek_usb2 supported scanners, so I've started comparing the logs and playback I've got to the commands used by Mustek_usb2. Thi