On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Jack McGill wrote:
>
> Hi Kelly,
> I have added your scanner to my database of small single-page sheetfed
> scanners at http://sites.google.com/site/roadwarriorscanner/. It sounds like
> your scanner is similar to the Plustek OpticSlim M12 and the hack described
Hi Jack,
Jack McGill schrieb:
> To list and Pierre,
>
> I recently received a Visioneer XP100, rev 3, usb vid x04a7 pid
> 0x049b, which has a GL842 chip inside. The model number on the
> bottom of the scanner is 85-0110-200. This scanner works very well
> using the Visioneer Roadwarrior settin
/ file
named 8bit_150dpi2.pdf.
Can you reproduce these bugs on your end with the Roadwarrior?
Jack McGill
--- On Mon, 3/16/09, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
> From: Pierre Willenbrock
> Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Genesys sheetfed scanner update
> To: jmcgill85258 at yahoo.com
> Cc: s
I'm wondering about my NeatReceipts Portable sheetfed scanner, USB
idVendor 07b3, idProduct 0462. Scans from XSane are comming in too
light and off contrast with the stock XSane 0.996. I use the
following site to get it recognized:
http://foss.bourgassociates.com
Anyone have any ideas?
On 3/16
that there is a limited selection of scan areas.
Also, I do have an OpticSlimM12 that I will give away for free to a developer
who promises to add calibration and better support.
Jack McGill
--- On Mon, 3/16/09, Kelly Price wrote:
> From: Kelly Price
> Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Genes
.
Jack McGill
--- On Mon, 3/16/09, Jack McGill wrote:
> From: Jack McGill
> Subject: [sane-devel] Genesys sheetfed scanner update
> To: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> Date: Monday, March 16, 2009, 5:22 PM
> To list and Pierre,
>
> I recently received a Visioneer X
To list and Pierre,
I recently received a Visioneer XP100, rev 3, usb vid x04a7 pid0x049b, which
has a GL842 chip inside. The model number on the bottom of the scanner is
85-0110-200. This scanner works very well using the Visioneer Roadwarrior
settings. I think they are identical twins ;-).
