Hi Peter.
Thanks. Right, the site I looked at before I bought the special cable
must have been wrong or I didn't read it right (remember 600 optical
and 1600 interpolated). Oh well 400dpi does seem correct per sites
today and is decent for a freebie; at least it's fast, and based on
the original r
Hi,
the HP SCL documentation says that the IIcx has a native resolution of
400 dpi and that it supports grayscale and color scans of 8 bits per
channel. So scanning at more than 400 dpi does not give more details.
When selecting to do color scans, it will scan with 3x8 bits = 24 bits
which is a
On Sat, 4 Sep 2004 18:21:11 -0400
George Georgalis wrote:
> It's spec says 600 dpi but somewhere between 300 and 400 dpi it
> starts to do double passes (exactly when it starts depends on the
> image). I think I understand what's happening, though I don't know
> the vocabulary to explain it (soft
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 15:22:42 +0100, Martin Collins wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Sep 2004 18:21:11 -0400
> George Georgalis wrote:
>
> > It's spec says 600 dpi but somewhere between 300 and 400 dpi it
> > starts to do double passes (exactly when it starts depends on the
> > image). I think I understand what
George Georgalis wrote:
> Thanks to some help on irc I've got my HP scanjet IIcx /t working.
>
> It's spec says 600 dpi but somewhere between 300 and 400 dpi it starts
> to do double passes (exactly when it starts depends on the image). I
> think I understand what's happening, though I don't know
>Please direct questions like this to the sane-devel mailing list.
Okay, I thought this was about using hardware ROM, but if it's related
to thr driver, that's better!
From: George Georgalis
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 14:24:20 -0400
Thanks to some help on irc I've got my HP scanjet IIcx /t working.
