nop
I will give you more details, so if you can help i will really apreciated
When i stop the power cycle of the scanner, everything goes fine for
about 15 min
then also if i don?t stop to scan pages still works
So the problem begin when stop scaning. The usb address change with no reason
(i don?t
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:48 PM, tobias alarcon wrote:
> nop
> I will give you more details, so if you can help i will really apreciated
> When i stop the power cycle of the scanner, everything goes fine for
> about 15 min
> then also if i don?t stop to scan pages still works
> So the problem
nop, still happen with scanimage or another frontend.
I update the kernel but nothing change.
I unplugged the scanner for a few minutes, and works fine for a while.
but then the usb address change always i try to scan.
i just don?t know what to do.
tobias.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:08 PM, m. al
i have never seen such a thing. does your OS turn on usb suspend?
allan
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 1:03 PM, tobias alarcon wrote:
> nop, still happen with scanimage or another frontend.
> I update the kernel but nothing change.
> I unplugged the scanner for a few minutes, and works fine for a whi
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 9:00 AM, m. allan noah wrote:
> are you using mandriva's sane package? what version? do you get the
> same problem if you install sane from our source instead?
>
yes, its 1.0.18. I install 1.0.18 and 1.0.19 from source and the problem remains
thanks
>
>
> allan
>
if you run scanimage repeatedly, this does not happen, but if you run
'your frontend' it does?
allan
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:48 AM, tobias alarcon wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 9:00 AM, m. allan noah wrote:
> > are you using mandriva's sane package? what version? do you get the
> > sam
are you using mandriva's sane package? what version? do you get the
same problem if you install sane from our source instead?
allan
On 3/25/08, tobias alarcon wrote:
> no, its mandriva 2008.0 with kernel 2.6.22.12
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:52 PM, m. allan noah
> wrote:
> > are you run
no, its mandriva 2008.0 with kernel 2.6.22.12
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:52 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
> are you running fedora?
>
> allan
>
>
>
> On 3/25/08, tobias alarcon wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Me again, this time its really strange problem
> > When i connect the usb, and run scanim
Hi all,
Me again, this time its really strange problem
When i connect the usb, and run scanimage -L
"fujitsu:libusb:005:002"
but when i run my front-end i get this message from /var/log/syslog
Mar 25 15:36:33 localhost kernel: usb 3-3: USB disconnect, address 2
Mar 25 15:36:48 localhost kernel:
are you running fedora?
allan
On 3/25/08, tobias alarcon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Me again, this time its really strange problem
> When i connect the usb, and run scanimage -L
>
> "fujitsu:libusb:005:002"
>
> but when i run my front-end i get this message from /var/log/syslog
>
> Mar 25 15:36:3
On 6/29/07, patrick blanchard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ADF Front, ADF Back work, but ADF Duplex does not return a front and back
> tif file (like Hylafax does).
>
> I thought the duplex tif would be a multipage, like an incoming Hylafax
> foo.tif fax?
nope. scanimage is not smart enough to do that. you n
Hi,
ADF Front, ADF Back work, but ADF Duplex does not return a front and back
tif file (like Hylafax does).
I thought the duplex tif would be a multipage, like an incoming Hylafax
foo.tif fax?
thanks
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.al
On 6/25/07, Skorous wrote:
> I'm sure allan will respond to this shortly as he's pretty active on
> the list but since I'm here right now: are you sure you're using the
> argument properly? Have you tried quoting the argument ( i.e. --source
> "ADF Duplex" )? I use those options with the 3091DC an
I'm sure allan will respond to this shortly as he's pretty active on
the list but since I'm here right now: are you sure you're using the
argument properly? Have you tried quoting the argument ( i.e. --source
"ADF Duplex" )? I use those options with the 3091DC and it works fine
( same backend ).
M
Hi,
first, thanks to the sane team and the fujitsu backenders.
1.0.18 builds on ubuntu 6.06.1 and scanimage works well w/ most options that
i tested so far - color, batch... and i'm still testing different options to
scanimage.
however, the ADF Front, ADF Back, ADF Duplex option of course default
Hi,
On 2006-06-01 11:14, m. allan noah wrote:
> >IIRC, saned uses the first 4 bytes in the data stream for the size of
> >the data that is transmitted.
>
> does that mean that if i actually gave it 8188 bytes, it would drop 4 of
> them? i need to look at saned more closely...
No data is dropped
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2006-06-01 10:46, m. allan noah wrote:
>> saned requests 8188 bytes, backend only returns 7656, cause that is an
>> even number of scanlines. the difference is 532. then saned asks for 528
>> bytes on the next attempt? why not 532? why
Hi,
On 2006-06-01 10:46, m. allan noah wrote:
> saned requests 8188 bytes, backend only returns 7656, cause that is an
> even number of scanlines. the difference is 532. then saned asks for 528
> bytes on the next attempt? why not 532? why not just transmit the 7656?
IIRC, saned uses the first
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2006-05-31 09:07, m. allan noah wrote:
>> On Tue, 30 May 2006, Jim McQuillan wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, I tried using scanimage without saned, and it works !
>>> Now, I need to figure out how to get saned working with this backend.
>>
>> Any
Hi,
On 2006-05-31 09:07, m. allan noah wrote:
> On Tue, 30 May 2006, Jim McQuillan wrote:
>
> >Ok, I tried using scanimage without saned, and it works !
> >Now, I need to figure out how to get saned working with this backend.
>
> Anyone here can give me any pointers? i wont rule out a bug in
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Jim McQuillan wrote:
> Ok, I tried using scanimage without saned, and it works !
> Now, I need to figure out how to get saned working with this backend.
Anyone here can give me any pointers? i wont rule out a bug in the
backend, but i dont know enough about saned to even
Allan,
Ok, I tried using scanimage without saned, and it works !
I tried various scans, both color and bw, and it looks great.
Now, I need to figure out how to get saned working with this backend.
Thanks for your help.
Jim McQuillan
j...@ltsp.org
m. allan noah wrote:
On Tue, 30 May
>>> On Tue, 30 May 2006, Jim McQuillan wrote:
>>>
I'm trying to get a Fujitsu 5120C working with SANE.
[fujitsu] sane_read: start
[fujitsu] read_from_scanner: start
[fujitsu] read_from_scanner: ERROR side:0 want:4203144 room:528/65536
doing:0
done:7656
[fuj
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Jim McQuillan wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 5:58 pm, m. allan noah wrote:
>> On Tue, 30 May 2006, Jim McQuillan wrote:
>>
>>> I'm trying to get a Fujitsu 5120C working with SANE.
>>>
>>> [fujitsu] sane_read: start
>>> [fujitsu] read_from_scanner: start
>>> [fujitsu] read_from_
On Tue, May 30, 2006 5:58 pm, m. allan noah wrote:
> On Tue, 30 May 2006, Jim McQuillan wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to get a Fujitsu 5120C working with SANE.
>>
>> I've tried version 1.0.17 of the backends, and i've also tried a fresh
>> checkout from cvs today (5/30/2006).
>
> use the cvs checkout.
>
>
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Jim McQuillan wrote:
> I'm trying to get a Fujitsu 5120C working with SANE.
>
> I've tried version 1.0.17 of the backends, and i've also tried a fresh
> checkout from cvs today (5/30/2006).
use the cvs checkout.
>
> The scanner is detected just fine under both versions of t
I'm trying to get a Fujitsu 5120C working with SANE.
I've tried version 1.0.17 of the backends, and i've also tried a fresh
checkout from cvs today (5/30/2006).
The scanner is detected just fine under both versions of the backends.
I'm using a SCSI interface.
When I try to scan with the scanim
27 matches
Mail list logo
