Hi,
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:29:43AM +, Jose Paulo Moitinho de Almeida wrote:
> If I understand correctly the summary is:
>
> - use dev->sane.type = "film scanner";
Ok. I will add a comment to the TODO list.
> - suggest to the frontends adding a button-type option "Query
> scan-informati
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 10:43:53AM +0100, Ulrich Deiters wrote:
> "Film scanner" would be more accurate in my opinion, because these
> devices usually can handle slides, negative strips, and spooled film.
>
> Is there a film scanner with automated frame selection? On the ones I
> know you have to
> "Film scanner" would be more accurate in my opinion, because these
> devices usually can handle slides, negative strips, and spooled film.
>
> Is there a film scanner with automated frame selection? On the ones I
> know you have to manually position a tab on the film strip holder.
Yes: all newe
"Film scanner" would be more accurate in my opinion, because these
devices usually can handle slides, negative strips, and spooled film.
Is there a film scanner with automated frame selection? On the ones I
know you have to manually position a tab on the film strip holder.
Regards,
Ulrich Deiter
On Monday 28 January 2002 09:43, Ulrich Deiters wrote:
> "Film scanner" would be more accurate in my opinion, because these
> devices usually can handle slides, negative strips, and spooled film.
>
> Is there a film scanner with automated frame selection? On the ones I
> know you have to manually p
Hello,
If I understand correctly the summary is:
- use dev->sane.type = "film scanner";
- suggest to the frontends adding a button-type option "Query
scan-information from scanner";
- the options allow the backend to recognise what the scanner can do;
- prepare for sane2 a way to automatically i
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 11:52:23AM +, Jose Paulo Moitinho de Almeida wrote:
> They can, probably I am wrong when I speak about the api, but my concern is
> that life may be easier if reasonable, common options are chosen before
> implementation. Perhaps what I want is to propose new "wel
Henning,
> That's right. Currently there is no well known type for film/slide scanners
> so I think we can add this in the standard.
>
> Are both names valid or should one of them be chosen? I mean: are
> these only different names or is this different hardware? Can the
> backend authors agree on
On Thursday 24 January 2002 19:54, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
>.
> >
> > scanimage -frame 3
>
> Does this mean "move to frame 3 and then scan an image" or just "move
> to frame 3"?
>
As far as I understand it is "move to frame 3 and then scan an image"
> ..
>
> Looks like all th
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 09:05:50AM +, Jose Paulo Moitinho de Almeida wrote:
> I have been looking at the "best way" to control film holder movement. As far
> as I could tell in 1.0.6 no backend was supporting this (at least the
> coolscan and the canon fs didn't).
>
> Today I had a loo
Hello
I have been looking at the "best way" to control film holder movement. As far
as I could tell in 1.0.6 no backend was supporting this (at least the
coolscan and the canon fs didn't).
Today I had a look at the coolscan2 project. It allows an option -frame as in:
scanimage -frame 3
My pr
11 matches
Mail list logo
