Hi,
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 21:46, Steven Palm wrote:
>
> On Jun 8, 2005, at 1:30 PM, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 08 June 2005 18:35, Steven Palm wrote:
> >
> >> scanimage(12019) malloc: *** error for object 0x303fe0: double free
> >> scanimage(12019) malloc: *** set a breakpoint in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> for( tmp = usbDevs; tmp; ) {
> tmp = usbDevs->next;
> free( usbDevs );
> usbDevs = tmp;
> }
should that not be
tmp = usbDevs;
while(tmp) {
...
}
??
Why use a for loop withou
Hi,
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 18:35, Steven Palm wrote:
> sane-find-scanner lists:
>
> found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x220d [CanoScan],
> chip=LM9832/3) at libusb:003:002-04a9-220d-ff-00
>
> scanimage -L lists:
>
> device `plustek:libusb:003:002-04a9-220d-ff-00' is a Canon N670
On Jun 8, 2005, at 1:30 PM, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 June 2005 18:35, Steven Palm wrote:
>
>> scanimage(12019) malloc: *** error for object 0x303fe0: double free
>> scanimage(12019) malloc: *** set a breakpoint in szone_error to debug
>>
>> Is this a known issue, or something unique
sane-find-scanner lists:
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x220d [CanoScan],
chip=LM9832/3) at libusb:003:002-04a9-220d-ff-00
scanimage -L lists:
device `plustek:libusb:003:002-04a9-220d-ff-00' is a Canon N670U/
N676U/LiDE20 USB flatbed scanner
scanimage(12019) malloc: *** er
