On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 12:10 +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> Please Cc: sane-devel so your "ordeal" gets archived.
Will do.
> bob writes:
> > On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 09:39 +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> >
> >> Hmm, log data looks fine to me. TPU area is reported fine. 48.26 mm
> >>
Hi Bob,
Please Cc: sane-devel so your "ordeal" gets archived.
bob writes:
> On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 09:39 +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>
>> Hmm, log data looks fine to me. TPU area is reported fine. 48.26 mm
>> by 231.14 mm is big enough to scan a strip of 6 negatives (that's what
>> the prod
bob writes:
> On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 08:43 +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>> bob writes:
>>
>> > Hello, I am new to the list. Scanning with gimp 2.2, xsane 0.97 GT-9300,
>> > and the Epson 2400 Photo scanner, regular scanning works fine. But when
>> > the transparency unit is selected the geometr
bob writes:
> Hello, I am new to the list. Scanning with gimp 2.2, xsane 0.97 GT-9300,
> and the Epson 2400 Photo scanner, regular scanning works fine. But when
> the transparency unit is selected the geometry is not automatically set
> to the center portion of the bed where the transparency ligh
Hello, I am new to the list. Scanning with gimp 2.2, xsane 0.97 GT-9300,
and the Epson 2400 Photo scanner, regular scanning works fine. But when
the transparency unit is selected the geometry is not automatically set
to the center portion of the bed where the transparency light is, the
default geom
