On Monday, 6. January 2003 20:37, Gene Heskett wrote:
[SNIP]
> Post a notice here when it is please :-)
Okay!
>
> >> I don't think this is quite "Ready for prime time" :-( We still
> >> have that white vertical line artifact, and the segfault at the
> >> end of the scan seems to be somewhat of a
On Tuesday 07 January 2003 12:56, Jaeger, Gerhard wrote:
>On Monday, 6. January 2003 20:37, Gene Heskett wrote:
>[SNIP]
>
>> Post a notice here when it is please :-)
>
>Okay!
>
>> >> I don't think this is quite "Ready for prime time" :-( We
>> >> still have that white vertical line artifact, and t
Hi Gene,
On Sunday, 5. January 2003 21:39, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> The artifact is still there, but I have a more pressing problem,
> I've forgotten the location of the focus variable, at 600 dpi, I'm
> seriously out of registration.
>
> Humm, might have found it, the comment says "senso
On Monday 06 January 2003 13:47, Jaeger, Gerhard wrote:
>Hi Gene,
>
>On Sunday, 5. January 2003 21:39, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Hi all;
>>
>> The artifact is still there, but I have a more pressing problem,
>> I've forgotten the location of the focus variable, at 600 dpi,
>> I'm seriously out of regi
Hi all;
The artifact is still there, but I have a more pressing problem,
I've forgotten the location of the focus variable, at 600 dpi, I'm
seriously out of registration.
Humm, might have found it, the comment says "sensor distance" & 16
is way too high for my scanner, so I'm rebuilding it at
