>At this point, the only thing i can think of is trying different
>distros. I think fedora 13 uses the sane-backends 1.0.21, so if they
>have a live cd...
Fedora Version 13 does use 1.0.21:
$ scanimage --version
scanimage (sane-backends) 1.0.21; backend version 1.0.21
but availability of
At this point, the only thing i can think of is trying different
distros. I think fedora 13 uses the sane-backends 1.0.21, so if they
have a live cd...
allan
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Kurt Rosenfeld
wrote:
> This is the ldd output on the Linux laptop where 1.0.21 doesn't
> work with the
This is the ldd output on the Linux laptop where 1.0.21 doesn't
work with the Canon 8800F:
bash-4.1$ ldd $(which scanimage)
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7fffac9e5000)
libsane.so.1 => /usr/lib/libsane.so.1 (0x7f41f608e000)
libv4l1.so.0 => /usr/lib64/libv4l1.so.0 (0x7f4
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 7:21 AM, m. allan noah wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Gernot Hassenpflug
> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Kurt Rosenfeld
>> wrote:
>>> Here is some good news. ?I tried Backends 1.0.21 on a FreeBSD 9
>>> machine and it works. ?Here is the stderr outp
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Kurt Rosenfeld
wrote:
> Here is some good news. ?I tried Backends 1.0.21 on a FreeBSD 9
> machine and it works. ?Here is the stderr output:
Well, interesting. Of course you need 1.0.21, since the scanner was
not supported in 1.0.20. However, it surprised me that t
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:47 AM, m. allan noah wrote:
> what version of libusb is in use on these different machines-
> including you Gernot...
This is what I have installed as far as lisbusb goes:
i libusb++-0.1-4c2- userspace C++ USB programming library
i libusb++-dev
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Kurt Rosenfeld
wrote:
> With the environment set as follows:
>
> # env | grep SANE
> DEBUG_SANE=255
> SANE_DEBUG_SANEI_USB=255
> SANE_DEBUG_DLL=255
>
> the command:
>
> scanimage 2> scanimage_may18_all255.txt > ofile
>
> produces the following stderr output:
> htt
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Gernot Hassenpflug
wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Kurt Rosenfeld
> wrote:
>> Here is some good news. ?I tried Backends 1.0.21 on a FreeBSD 9
>> machine and it works. ?Here is the stderr output:
>
> Well, interesting. Of course you need 1.0.21, since the
what version of libusb is in use on these different machines-
including you Gernot...
allan
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Kurt Rosenfeld
wrote:
> Here is some good news. ?I tried Backends 1.0.21 on a FreeBSD 9
> machine and it works. ?Here is the stderr output:
>
> http://acm.poly.edu/~kurt/s
Here is some good news. I tried Backends 1.0.21 on a FreeBSD 9
machine and it works. Here is the stderr output:
http://acm.poly.edu/~kurt/scanimage_freebsd_all255.txt
This is the first time I tried it on a FreeBSD 9 machine.
I tried it before on another older FreeBSD 7 machine and it
seemed to
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:32 AM, m. allan noah wrote:
> DEBUG_SANE_SANEI_USB is not a proper variable. should be SANE_DEBUG_SANEI_USB
Argh! Thanks for that, I checked the man pages and thought I had
copied it down correctly. Kurt, can you please try again? Sorry about
that.
Regards,
Gernot
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Kurt Rosenfeld
wrote:
> Gernot,
>
> This is the stderr output of scanimage with DEBUG_SANE,
> DEBUG_SANE_SANEI_USB, and SANE_DEBUG_DLL all set to 255:
> http://acm.poly.edu/~kurt/scanimage_all255.txt
>
> Here is the stderr output of scanimage -d test
> with SANE_DE
With the environment set as follows:
# env | grep SANE
DEBUG_SANE=255
SANE_DEBUG_SANEI_USB=255
SANE_DEBUG_DLL=255
the command:
scanimage 2> scanimage_may18_all255.txt > ofile
produces the following stderr output:
http://acm.poly.edu/~kurt/scanimage_may18_all255.txt
thanks, -kurt
On Tue, May 1
DEBUG_SANE_SANEI_USB is not a proper variable. should be SANE_DEBUG_SANEI_USB
allan
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Gernot Hassenpflug
wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Kurt Rosenfeld
> wrote:
>> Gernot,
>>
>> This is the stderr output of scanimage with DEBUG_SANE,
>> DEBUG_SANE_SANEI_
Gernot,
This is the stderr output of scanimage with DEBUG_SANE,
DEBUG_SANE_SANEI_USB, and SANE_DEBUG_DLL all set to 255:
http://acm.poly.edu/~kurt/scanimage_all255.txt
Here is the stderr output of scanimage -d test
with SANE_DEBUG_TEST set to 255:
http://acm.poly.edu/~kurt/scanimage_-d_test.txt
Hello Kurt,
I am concerned about this part of the log file:
[pixma] pixma_open(): Canoscan 8800F
[pixma] WARNING:pixma_write(): count(0) != len(16)
[pixma] OUT T=3.054 len=-1
[pixma] :ef 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
[pixma] ERROR: EIO
It looks as though the scanner i
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 10:56:27PM -0400, Kurt Rosenfeld wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:48:59AM +0900, Gernot Hassenpflug wrote:
> > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Kurt Rosenfeld
> > wrote:
> > > Thanks for responding. ?Here is a log of scanimage
> > > run as root in Linux, without the
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Kurt Rosenfeld
wrote:
> Thanks for responding. ?Here is a log of scanimage
> run as root in Linux, without the -T:
> http://isis.poly.edu/~kurt/scanimage_debuglevel_21.txt
> sane-find-scanner consistently finds the scanner.
>
> I am running it in native Linux and
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 2:22 AM, m. allan noah wrote:
> Can we see a log of scanimage run as root, without the -T?
>
> also- are you running this thing under some kind of VM?
>
> allan
I've never seen this kind of error on my 8800F under windows XP,
Vista, or linux. Does the device work perfectly
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:48:59AM +0900, Gernot Hassenpflug wrote:
> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Kurt Rosenfeld
> wrote:
> > Thanks for responding. ?Here is a log of scanimage
> > run as root in Linux, without the -T:
> > http://isis.poly.edu/~kurt/scanimage_debuglevel_21.txt
> > sane-find
Thanks for responding. Here is a log of scanimage
run as root in Linux, without the -T:
http://isis.poly.edu/~kurt/scanimage_debuglevel_21.txt
sane-find-scanner consistently finds the scanner.
I am running it in native Linux and native FreeBSD (two
separate boxes, both running sane-backends 1.0.
Can we see a log of scanimage run as root, without the -T?
also- are you running this thing under some kind of VM?
allan
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Kurt Rosenfeld
wrote:
> If anybody has any ideas, I'd love to hear them. ?Otherwise I will
> return the scanner to the store. ?scanimage fail
If anybody has any ideas, I'd love to hear them. Otherwise I will
return the scanner to the store. scanimage fails even when run
as root. thanks, -kurt
- Forwarded message from Kurt Rosenfeld -
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 22:30:47 -0400
From: Kurt Rosenfeld
To: sane-devel at lists.alioth.
did you try as root?
allan
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Kurt Rosenfeld
wrote:
> SANE People,
>
> I bought a Canon Canoscan 8800F but have not been able to get it
> to work. ?This is the stderr output with SANE_DEBUG_PIXMA=21:
> ? ? ? ?http://acm.poly.edu/~kurt/scanimage-T_debuglevel21.txt
>
SANE People,
I bought a Canon Canoscan 8800F but have not been able to get it
to work. This is the stderr output with SANE_DEBUG_PIXMA=21:
http://acm.poly.edu/~kurt/scanimage-T_debuglevel21.txt
The OS is Linux 2.6.33.2 x86_64. It failed in FreeBSD as well.
The stderr output without setti
Dear all,
I just noticed at Yodobashi Camera today in Tokyo that Canon's
CanoScan 8800F has ended production.
The current models being sold are the CanoScan 5600F, the LiDE 200 and
the LiDE 700.
Regards,
Gernot Hassenpflug
26 matches
Mail list logo
